概括
评估决策能力 (DMC) 可能是风险敏感的,这意味着值根据决策风险进行调整. 这种方法是连贯的,避免了父权主义,并增强了评估中的认识目标.
科学领域:
- 生物伦理学生物伦理学
- 医疗法 法律 医疗法
- 医学哲学 医学哲学
背景情况:
- 评估决策能力 (DMC) 是一个长期的辩论.
- 一个关键的问题是DMC值是否应该根据与决定相关的风险而有所不同.
研究的目的:
- 提供对风险敏感决策能力 (DMC) 评估的全面说明.
- 为了应对对风险敏感的DMC是父权主义或不连贯的批评.
主要方法:
- 对风险敏感的DMC的支持和反对论据的哲学分析.
- 为风险敏感的DMC评估制定一个连贯的框架.
主要成果:
- 风险敏感的DMC被证明是一个连贯的概念.
- 拟议的框架避免了DMC评估中的父权主义.
- 风险敏感的DMC被认为可以更好地实现认识目标.
结论:
- 决策能力的评估可以而且应该是风险敏感的.
- 这种方法提高了能力评估的严谨性和道德健全性.
- 解决批评者的担忧证实了风险敏感的DMC的连贯性和非父权主义性质.
相关概念视频
Decision Making
143
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
143
Decision Making: Traditional Method
4.0K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.0K
Decision Making: P-value Method
5.5K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.5K
Reason and Intuition
6.5K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.5K
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
71
Flood risk assessment involves careful planning and analysis to ensure the safety of communities near water retention structures. Capacity contours are a vital tool in this process, as they illustrate the potential spread of water at specific levels in a given area. In the context of building a bund across a small valley, these contours play a critical role in evaluating the safety of nearby residential areas.In this example, the bund is intended to store stormwater in the valley. The engineers...
71
Lazarus's Cognitive Appraisal Theory
287
Cognitive psychologist Richard Lazarus proposed the cognitive-mediational theory of emotions, which emphasizes how individuals' assessments of stressors significantly affect their experience of stress. According to Lazarus, the stress response is determined by a two-step appraisal process: primary appraisal and secondary appraisal. These cognitive appraisals help individuals evaluate the potential impact of a stressor and determine the adequacy of their coping resources.
Primary Appraisal:...
Primary Appraisal:...
287


