在刺话语中对 (不) 诚意的感知:研究使用微小不同文本的文字阅读时间
1School of Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, Victoria University of Wellington.
概括
处理刺内容需要更多的认知努力,影响理解. 这项研究将刺的阅读时间较慢与较低的真诚度评分联系起来,特别是在初次接触后.
科学领域:
- 认知心理学 认知心理学
- 语言学的语言学.
- 沟通研究 沟通研究
背景情况:
- 刺的理解是复杂的,涉及到超越字面意义的细微理解.
- 刺吸收等理论模型表明,特定的认知过程参与其中.
- 个人差异可能会影响个人如何有效地处理刺话语.
研究的目的:
- 探讨处理刺文本与刺吸收概念之间的关系.
- 检查刺内容如何影响文字阅读时间和真诚感知.
- 探索个体差异的作用,如需要认知和类型熟悉,在刺理解.
主要方法:
- 进行了两项实验,使用微差别的刺文本和非刺文本.
- 记录了参与者的文字阅读时间和真诚度等级.
- 认知需求 (NFC) 和类型熟悉度被评估为个人差异因素.
主要成果:
- 在这两项实验中,刺文本的阅读速度明显慢于非刺文本.
- 刺文本的阅读时间较长与诚意评分较低相关,特别是在初次曝光后.
- 认知需求在实验1中显示与阅读时间的相互作用,但对类型的熟悉程度的影响最小.
结论:
- 成功的刺吸收似乎需要增加认知处理的努力.
- 这些发现支持刺和口头刺的理论模型,突出了非字面语言的认知需求.
- 像NFC这样的个体差异可能起作用,但在刺处理中需要进一步调查.
更多相关视频
07:36Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
Published on: November 30, 2018
15.8K
05:54Eye-tracking to Distinguish Comprehension-based and Oculomotor-based Regressive Eye Movements During Reading
Published on: October 18, 2018
6.2K
相关概念视频
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
5.2K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
5.2K
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
50.0K
According to Charles Cooley, we base our image on what we think other people see (Cooley 1902). We imagine how we must appear to others, then react to this speculation. We don certain clothes, prepare our hair in a particular manner, wear makeup, use cologne, and the like—all with the notion that our presentation of ourselves is going to affect how others perceive us. We expect a certain reaction, and, if lucky, we get the one we desire and feel good about it. But more than that, Cooley...
50.0K
Framing Effects
7.4K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
7.4K
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping
39.1K
People can go to great lengths to protect their self-image and present themselves in ways that they want others to see them. Sociologist Erving Goffman presented the idea that a person is like an actor on a stage. Calling his theory dramaturgy, Goffman believed that we use “impression management” to present ourselves to others as we hope to be perceived. Each situation is a new scene, and individuals perform different roles depending on who is present (Goffman, 1959). Think about...
39.1K
Social Proof
27.7K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.7K
Stereotype Content Model
14.8K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.8K
