医疗教育改革是否会改变谁被选中? 一项来自中国的全国横截面调查
You You1,2, Weimin Wang1,3, Jennifer Cleland4
1National Center for Health Professions Education Development, Peking University, Beijing, People's Republic of China youyou.pku@outlook.com wwm@bjmu.edu.cn.
BMJ open
|August 11, 2023
概括
中国在医学教育中的新试点项目 (PPs) 吸引了国家大学入学考试 (NCEE) 成绩较高的学生. 然而,这种对学术成绩的重视减少了学生的多样性,可能阻碍了为人口的健康需求服务的目标.
科学领域:
- 医学教育 医学教育
- 公共卫生政策 公共卫生政策
- 教育社会学教育的社会学
背景情况:
- 中国实施了一项教育计划,以提高医疗教育质量和公共卫生服务.
- 为了实现这些目标,新的试点计划 (PPs) 与传统计划 (TPs) 一起建立.
- 一个关键的目标是通过选择学术更强的候选人来提高医学教育质量.
研究的目的:
- 为了比较被录取到中国医学院的试点课程 (PPs) 和传统课程 (TPs) 的学生的学术和社会人口统计资料.
- 评估PP是否成功地根据教育计划选择了学术优秀的学生.
主要方法:
- 一项采用2021年中国医学学生调查数据的横截面研究.
- 参与了来自中国123所医学院的204,817名临床医学本科生.
- 通过使用统计测试和多层次回归分析,比较了PP和TP学生之间的全国大学入学考试 (NCEE) 成绩和社会人口统计因素.
主要成果:
- 与TP学生相比,PP学生的NCEE中位数明显高于TP学生.
- 在控制了NCEE分数后,PP学生更有可能来自城市地区,不是第一代大学生,父母的社会经济地位更高.
- 试点项目成功地选择了具有更高学业成绩的学生.
结论:
- 中国医学教育的试点项目已经实现了选择具有更高学术成绩的学生的目标.
- 这种选择策略导致学生群体的多样性减少,这可能会影响更广泛的目标,即解决中国多样化的健康需求.
- 这些发现表明,学术选择性和医疗教育多样性之间存在一种权衡,这对未来的政策有影响.
更多相关视频
05:58Evaluation of a Point-of-Care Testing Analyzer for Measuring Peripheral Blood Leukocytes
Published on: March 22, 2022
4.1K
09:16Author Spotlight: Optimization of Processing Technology for Tiebangchui with Zanba Based on CRITIC Combined with Box-Behnken Response Surface Method
Published on: May 12, 2023
1.2K
相关概念视频
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
5.7K
The issues and trends in healthcare delivery are constantly changing. The COVID-19 pandemic is one recent issue that wreaked havoc on healthcare systems, causing a shortage of healthcare workers, high demand for medicines and supplies, and increased medical expenditure due to a lack of insurance. Other issues include rising healthcare costs and care fragmentation.
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
5.7K
Reliability and Validity
12.8K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
12.8K
