Jove
Visualize
联系我们

相关概念视频

Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

12.8K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
12.8K
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification03:00

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

5.2K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
5.2K
Confidence Coefficient01:24

Confidence Coefficient

7.7K
The confidence coefficient is also known as the confidence level or degree of confidence. It is the percent expression for the probability, 1-α, that the confidence interval contains the true population parameter assuming that the confidence interval is obtained after sufficient unbiased sampling; for example, if the CL = 90%, then in 90 out of 100 samples the interval estimate will enclose the true population parameter. Here α is the area under the curve, distributed equally under...
7.7K
Data Validation01:03

Data Validation

5.1K
Data validation is an essential part of a comprehensive assessment. Validation is confirming or verifying and opening the door to gathering more assessment data as it clarifies vague or unclear data. The process of checking and verifying the collected information is called data validation. The primary purpose of data validation is to ensure data is as free from error, bias, and misinterpretation as possible.
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
5.1K
Statistical Significance01:50

Statistical Significance

20.2K
Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...
20.2K
z Scores and Unusual Values01:07

z Scores and Unusual Values

9.9K
The z score is one of the three measures of relative standing. It describes the location of a value in a dataset relative to the mean. z scores are obtained after the standardization of the values in a dataset. The z score for the mean is 0.
 This score indicates how far a value is from the mean in terms of standard deviation. For example, if a data value has a z score of +1, the researcher can infer that the particular data value is one standard deviation above the mean. If another data...
9.9K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Real-World Data on the Use of Intravenous Fosfomycin for the Treatment of Central Nervous System Infections: a Subgroup Analysis from the FORTRESS Study.

Infectious diseases and therapy·2026
Same author

Endothelial cell responses in sepsis are attenuated by targeting truncated procalcitonin.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Management of Type A Aortic Dissection: First, Exclude Cardiac Ischemia Intraoperatively, Then Proceed With Repair.

The Annals of thoracic surgery·2026
Same author

Outcomes after postcardiotomy venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in young patients: An individual patient data meta-analysis.

JTCVS open·2025
Same author

DPP4 inhibition curbs systemic inflammation.

Critical care (London, England)·2025
Same author

Unplanned Postoperative Angiography After Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: State of the Art and Future Perspective.

Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)·2025
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关实验视频

Updated: Jul 19, 2025

Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory
07:59

Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory

Published on: June 14, 2019

8.0K

对REMEMBER分数的外部验证

Armin Darius Peivandi1, Henryk Welp1, Sebastian Kintrup2

  • 1Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.

Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine
|August 14, 2023
PubMed
概括

旨在预测冠状动脉绕道移植 (CABG) 后死亡率的REMEMBER评分与静脉外体膜氧化 (VA-ECMO) 显示在外部验证中表现不佳. 这一分数不适用于预测该患者群体的住院死亡率.

关键词:
心脏衰竭是因为心脏衰竭.冠状动脉绕道移植冠状动脉绕道移植身体外生命支持风险评分风险评分是什么意思评分系统 评分系统

更多相关视频

A Real-world What-Where-When Memory Test
09:13

A Real-world What-Where-When Memory Test

Published on: May 16, 2017

11.4K
The Deese-Roediger-McDermott DRM Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory
07:26

The Deese-Roediger-McDermott DRM Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory

Published on: January 31, 2017

38.1K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jul 19, 2025

Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory
07:59

Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory

Published on: June 14, 2019

8.0K
A Real-world What-Where-When Memory Test
09:13

A Real-world What-Where-When Memory Test

Published on: May 16, 2017

11.4K
The Deese-Roediger-McDermott DRM Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory
07:26

The Deese-Roediger-McDermott DRM Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory

Published on: January 31, 2017

38.1K

科学领域:

  • 心脏病学 心脏病学
  • 心血管外科心血管外科
  • 关键护理医学 关键护理医学

背景情况:

  • 在冠状动脉旁路移植 (CABG) 后使用静脉外体膜氧化 (VA-ECMO) 与高住院死亡率有关.
  • REMEMBER评分是为了预测需要VA-ECMO的CABG患者的住院死亡率而开发的.

研究的目的:

  • 在接受VA-ECMO的CABG患者的一个不同的队列中,对REMEMBER得分的预测性能的外部验证.
  • 评估REMEMBER得分在预测住院死亡率方面的准确性.

主要方法:

  • 在2012年至2021年期间接受VA-ECMO的107名CABG患者的回顾性分析.
  • 使用一致性统计和ROC曲线分析评估REMEMBER分数的区分能力.
  • 使用大尺度校准和校准斜率对校准的评估.

主要成果:

  • 该研究包括107名患者,住院死亡率为45.8%.
  • 在REMEMBER分数中,分辨能力低 (AUC:0.623) 和校准不佳 (截面p=0.0195,斜率p=0.0303).
  • 通过REMEMBER得分预测的死亡率中位数为52%,与观察到的死亡率不同.

结论:

  • 发现REMEMBER得分不准确,不适用于预测VA-ECMO治疗的CABG患者的住院死亡率.
  • 建议进行进一步的外部验证研究,最好是在多中心环境中进行,以证实这些发现.