人类测量失败在印度五岁以下儿童中的区域分布及其决定因素
Ramendra Nath Kundu1, Juri Borah2, Susmita Bharati3
1Research Associate-I, Indian Council of Medical Research - Centre for Ageing & Mental Health, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Ethiopian journal of health sciences
|August 14, 2023
概括
超过一半的印度五岁以下的儿童经历了人体测量失败,西部,东部和中部地区的比例更高. 关键决定因素包括贫血,性别,父母身份,出生顺序,母亲教育和社会经济因素.
科学领域:
- 儿童健康与营养问题
- 公共卫生 公共卫生
- 人口统计学 人口统计学
背景情况:
- 营养不良是印度等发展中国家的严重健康问题.
- 人类测量失败,以衰减,体重不足或衰减为标志,影响了许多儿童.
- 了解其流行率和驱动因素对于有效的干预至关重要.
研究的目的:
- 确定5岁以下印度儿童的人类测量失败的分布.
- 确定影响印度不同地区的人类测量失败的关键决定因素.
主要方法:
- 利用了国家家庭健康调查 (NFHS-5) (2019-2021) 的数据.
- 采用皮尔森的千平方测试用于变量关联.
- 应用二进制后勤回归来识别人类测量失败的解释因素.
主要成果:
- 超过一半 (52.18%) 的印度五岁以下的儿童表现出人类学失败.
- 在西部 (57.88%),东部 (56.58%) 和中部 (53.94%) 地区观察到的患病率最高.
- 发现了与贫血,男性性别,父母缺席,出生顺序较高,母亲教育程度较低,农村居住,部落/种姓地位,核家庭和较低财富指数的显著关联.
结论:
- 人类测量失败的区域差异需要量身定制的营养计划.
- 解决社会经济和人口因素对于改善儿童营养结果至关重要.
相关概念视频
Nature and Nurture
20.5K
Many human characteristics, like height, are shaped by both nature—in other words, by our genes—and by nurture, or our environment. For example, chronic stress during childhood inhibits the production of growth hormones and consequently reduces bone growth and height. Scientists estimate that 70-90% of variation in height is due to genetic differences among individuals, and 10-30% of variation in height is due to differences in the environments that individuals experience,...
20.5K
Regression Toward the Mean
6.3K
Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when...
6.3K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
352
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
352
Variation: Normal Distribution, Range, and Standard Deviation
22.3K
In the field of psychology, there are several ways to organize measurements of a trait, feature, or characteristic (i.e., variables). Qualitative data, such as ethnicity, can be tabulated into a frequency count to provide information about the proportion, as well as the variety of groups in a sample or population. On the other hand, researchers can perform a wider set of calculations on quantitative data. The mean, mode, and median, for instance, are central tendency measures to identify a...
22.3K
Anorexia Nervosa
147
Anorexia nervosa is a complex and severe eating disorder characterized by an intense fear of weight gain, an unrelenting pursuit of thinness, and a distorted body image. It often leads to dangerously low body weight relative to an individual's age and height. This disorder is marked by significant physical and psychological consequences, making it one of the most life-threatening psychiatric illnesses.
Symptoms and Physical Effects
Individuals with anorexia nervosa commonly exhibit extreme...
Symptoms and Physical Effects
Individuals with anorexia nervosa commonly exhibit extreme...
147
Applications of Normal Distribution
5.2K
The normal distribution is a useful statistical tool. One of its practical applications is determining the door height after considering the normal distribution of heights of persons, such that many can pass through it easily without striking their heads. The normal distribution can also determine the probability of a person having a height less than a specific height.
The heights of 15 to 18-year-old males from Chile from 1984 to 1985 followed a normal distribution. The mean height is 172.36...
The heights of 15 to 18-year-old males from Chile from 1984 to 1985 followed a normal distribution. The mean height is 172.36...
5.2K


