对表达式预测计算方法的系统比较
bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology
|August 14, 2023
概括
机器学习模型可以预测细胞转录组的变化,但它们的准确性是未知的. 一个新的基准测试平台显示,这些表达式预测方法往往无法超过简单的基线.
科学领域:
- 计算生物学是一种计算生物学.
- 系统生物学 系统生物学
- 基因组学就是基因组学.
背景情况:
- 表达式预测方法利用机器学习来预测细胞转录组变化后的扰动.
- 这些方法为发育遗传学和细胞命运工程中的实验方法提供了快速,经济高效的替代方案.
- 这些预测模型的准确性和比较性能仍然不充分描述,阻碍了它们的有效应用和开发.
研究的目的:
- 开发一个全面的基准测试平台,用于评估表达式预测方法.
- 系统地评估各种方法,参数和数据源的性能.
- 确定当前表达式预测技术的优点和局限性.
主要方法:
- 创建一个基准测试平台,整合11个大规模扰动数据集.
- 包括一个支持各种表达式预测方法的软件引擎.
- 对方法,参数和辅助数据源的系统评估.
主要成果:
- 方法的性能高度依赖于所选择的评估指标.
- 像平均平方误差这样的简单指标往往显示表达式预测方法表现低于基本基线.
- 基准测试平台为方法评估提供了一种标准化的方法.
结论:
- 表达式预测方法需要严格的基准测试来了解它们的预测能力.
- 性能评估对于指导这些计算工具的改进至关重要.
- 开发的平台将有助于识别在生物研究中的表达预测的合适应用.
相关概念视频
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving
81
Mechanistic models play a crucial role in algorithms for numerical problem-solving, particularly in nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NMEM). These models aim to minimize specific objective functions by evaluating various parameter estimates, leading to the development of systematic algorithms. In some cases, linearization techniques approximate the model using linear equations.
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
81
Predicting Products: Substitution vs. Elimination
11.9K
When a nucleophile and an alkyl halide react, nucleophilic substitution and β-elimination reactions compete to generate products.
The following factors can influence the mechanisms competing against each other:
The following factors can influence the mechanisms competing against each other:
11.9K
Determination of Expected Frequency
2.2K
Suppose one wants to test independence between the two variables of a contingency table. The values in the table constitute the observed frequencies of the dataset. But how does one determine the expected frequency of the dataset? One of the important assumptions is that the two variables are independent, which means the variables do not influence each other. For independent variables, the statistical probability of any event involving both variables is calculated by multiplying the individual...
2.2K
Statistical Analysis: Overview
6.7K
When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
6.7K
Multiple Comparison Tests
3.9K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
3.9K
Improving Translational Accuracy
11.6K
Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
11.6K


