在彩虹背后隐藏着什么?阴谋 性别意识形态和LGBTQ+游说集团阴谋 (GILC) 的规模
Marco Salvati1, Valerio Pellegrini2, Valeria De Cristofaro2
1Department of Human Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
The British journal of social psychology
|August 22, 2023
概括
本研究介绍了性别意识形态和LGBTQ+游说阴谋 (GILC) 规模,以衡量关于LGBTQ+人的信仰. 经过验证的GILC尺度表现出强大的心理测量特性,用于评估这些特定的阴谋论信念.
科学领域:
- 心理学 心理学 心理学
- 社会学 社会学 社会学
- 社会心理学 社会心理学
背景情况:
- 阴谋论文学在很大程度上忽视了与LGBTQ+相关的理论.
- 在理解针对性别意识形态和LGBTQ+个人的特定阴谋信念方面存在差距.
研究的目的:
- 开发和验证可靠的衡量性别意识形态和LGBTQ+游说阴谋 (GILC) 信念的尺度.
- 评估GILC尺度的心理测量属性并构建其有效性.
主要方法:
- 两个独立的数据收集 (N=1,908) 涉及不同的性取向.
- 规模开发和验证,包括因数结构,可靠性和不变性测试.
- 根据一般阴谋思维,性偏见和社会政治变量 (RWA,SDO) 评估标准的有效性.
主要成果:
- 吉尔克尺度表现出一个强大的单因素结构,具有高的内部可靠性.
- 这一尺度在性别,性取向和对性别意识形态的先前知识方面证明是不变的.
- 在GILC尺度有效地区别于一般的阴谋信仰,阴谋思维和性偏见的措施.
结论:
- 吉尔克尺度是测量特定的阴谋论信仰关于LGBTQ+人的心理测量声音,简短的仪器.
- 研究结果支持该尺度在研究偏见,意识形态和阴谋论方面的实用性.
- 强调需要进一步研究这些信仰的心理基础和社会影响.
更多相关视频
06:42Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
Published on: September 28, 2018
11.7K
10:03Rapid and Robust Analysis of Cellular and Molecular Polarization Induced by Chemokine Signaling
Published on: December 12, 2014
8.2K
相关概念视频
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
90.3K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
90.3K
In- and Out-Groups
39.1K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
39.1K
Group Polarization
34.3K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
34.3K
Groupthink
44.5K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
44.5K
Stereotype Content Model
14.8K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.8K
Levels of Communication II: Organizational, Public, and Group Dynamics
2.1K
Effective communication is the foundation of a good organization. Communication is the lifeblood of an organization that connects the group with messages. In an organization, communication occurs in upward, downward, and horizontal lines. Downward communication travels from the administrative and senior levels to the staff through official channels such as manuals, rules and regulations, and organizational charts. Staff members initiate upward communication, which is addressed to executives and...
2.1K
