Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Persuasion Strategies01:52

Persuasion Strategies

38.8K
Researchers have tested many persuasion strategies, including the foot-in-the door and the door-in-the-face techniques, in a variety of contexts. Ultimately, the principles are effective in selling products and changing people’s attitude, ideas, and behaviors (Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004).
38.8K
Operant Conditioning Intervention01:24

Operant Conditioning Intervention

81
Operant conditioning serves as a foundational principle in therapeutic interventions aimed at modifying maladaptive behaviors. Central to this approach is the notion that behaviors, both adaptive and maladaptive, are learned through reinforcement. By analyzing the environmental factors that reinforce problematic behaviors, clinicians can design interventions to weaken these reinforcements and replace maladaptive behaviors with healthier alternatives.
In operant conditioning, behaviors that are...
81
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

23.1K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
23.1K
Community Based Intervention01:30

Community Based Intervention

65
Community-based interventions in mental health represent a paradigm shift from institution-centered care to treatments embedded within the fabric of local communities. By prioritizing inclusion and leveraging existing societal structures, this approach fosters a supportive environment conducive to addressing mental health challenges while promoting individual dignity and agency.
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
65
Statistical Significance01:50

Statistical Significance

20.2K
Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...
20.2K
Group Design02:01

Group Design

9.0K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
9.0K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Acceptability of an online theory-based intervention to support healthcare professionals' delivery of health behaviour change interventions: A theoretically framed qualitative study.

British journal of health psychology·2026
Same author

Collaborative development of a digital intervention to support opioid tapering after surgery in primary care: an experience-based co-design study with patients and clinicians.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

Identifying Barriers and Facilitators to Providing Psychologically Safe Care in Inpatient Mental Healthcare. A Theoretical Domains Framework-Informed Qualitative Study.

Journal of clinical nursing·2026
Same author

Mindfulness-based interventions and cognitive behavioral therapy for depression, anxiety, and stress in adults with chronic conditions: a stratified subgroup meta-analysis.

Npj mental health research·2026
Same author

Interventions to Improve Breast Screening Uptake for Black African Women in High Income Countries: A Systematic Review.

Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities·2026
Same author

How Effective Are Credible Sources in Changing Behavior? A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2026

相关实验视频

Updated: Jul 18, 2025

Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design
07:40

Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design

Published on: May 31, 2021

3.4K

根据参与者反改进干预措施是否会提高接受度? 一种实验性的方法.

Chris Keyworth1, Leah Quinlivan2, Jessica Z Leather2,3

  • 1School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK. C.keyworth@leeds.ac.uk.

BMC public health
|August 23, 2023
PubMed
概括

根据参与者的反来改进干预措施,在一项针对自伤成年人的研究中,并没有显著提高接受度. 原版和修改版都被认为同样可接受,突出了需要进一步研究的需要.

关键词:
可接受性 可接受性这是一个实验性的实验.干预设计 干预设计混合方法混合方法.

更多相关视频

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

3.8K
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

8.7K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jul 18, 2025

Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design
07:40

Validation of a Psychosocial Intervention on Body Image in Older People: An Experimental Design

Published on: May 31, 2021

3.4K
Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

3.8K
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

8.7K

科学领域:

  • 心理学 心理学 心理学
  • 公共卫生 公共卫生
  • 干预科学 干预科学

背景情况:

  • 参与者的反对于干预措施的可接受性至关重要.
  • 然而,关于纳入反是否提高了可接受性的证据是有限的.

研究的目的:

  • 评估基于参与者的反来改进干预措施是否会增加其可接受性.
  • 利用基于理论的方法来评估干预修改.

主要方法:

  • 393名英国成年人参与了这项研究,这些成年人有过自我伤害史.
  • 干预是在基线和随访 (6个月) 时进行的.
  • 参与者被随机分配到接受原始干预或反精细干预,可接受性被评为理论可接受性框架 (TFA) 的七个领域.

主要成果:

  • 在对照组和实验组之间没有观察到可接受性的显著变化.
  • 参与者认为原始和修改后的干预版本都同样可以接受.

结论:

  • 根据参与者的反改进干预措施在本研究中没有影响接受度.
  • 建立了评估反影响的强有力的方法.
  • 需要进行进一步的研究,以优化参与者反在医疗保健干预开发中的整合.