使用没有上述的 (NOTA) 伤害了学生的信心吗?
1Department of Psychology, California State University, East Bay, 25800 Carlos Bee Blvd., Hayward, CA 94542, USA.
Journal of Intelligence
|August 25, 2023
概括
没有上述 (NOTA) 选项的多选题不会显著影响学生的成绩或项目对项的信心. 然而,当NOTA是一个选择时,学生报告总体信心较低.
科学领域:
- 教育心理学教育心理学
- 评估和测量的评估和测量
背景情况:
- 学生认为具有竞争性分心因素或没有上述 (NOTA) 选项的多选择题具有挑战性.
- 评估研究人员对在评估中使用NOTA选项的教学影响表示担忧.
研究的目的:
- 调查将NOTA作为多选项选项在学生信心和成绩上的影响.
- 为了比较标准多选项和NOTA条件之间的项目对项目信心和总的信心判断.
主要方法:
- 四个实验进行在线 (事) 和在课堂上 (课程相关问题).
- 参与者以基本的多选项格式和以NOTA.取代不正确选项的格式回答了同等的问题.
- 在每一个问题后收集了项目对项目的信任评级,随后是总体的信任判断和定性反.
主要成果:
- 在所有实验中,在基本条件和NOTA条件之间没有观察到对项目信心或性能的显著差异.
- 与基本条件相比,参与者对NOTA条件的总体信心显著下降.
- 定性评论为学生对NOTA问题的看法提供了额外的见解.
结论:
- 与普遍认为的相反,NOTA选项似乎不会对学生逐个问题的信心或表现产生负面影响.
- 对NOTA问题的感知困难或负面影响可能源于总的信任判断,而不是立即响应评估.
- 进一步的研究可能会探索NOTA对测试策略和整体评估有效性的微妙影响.
更多相关视频
10:26Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
Published on: September 11, 2021
4.0K
07:59Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory
Published on: June 14, 2019
8.0K
相关概念视频
Reliability and Validity
12.8K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
12.8K
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies
37.7K
When we hold a stereotype about a person, we have expectations that he or she will fulfill that stereotype. A self-fulfilling prophecy is an expectation held by a person that alters his or her behavior in a way that tends to make it true. When we hold stereotypes about a person, we tend to treat the person according to our expectations. This treatment can influence the person to act according to our stereotypic expectations, thus confirming our stereotypic beliefs. Research by Rosenthal and...
37.7K
Hindsight Biases
3.4K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?
3.4K
Conformity
45.2K
Conformity is the change in a person’s behavior to go along with the group, even if that person does not agree with the group.
45.2K
Confidence Coefficient
7.7K
The confidence coefficient is also known as the confidence level or degree of confidence. It is the percent expression for the probability, 1-α, that the confidence interval contains the true population parameter assuming that the confidence interval is obtained after sufficient unbiased sampling; for example, if the CL = 90%, then in 90 out of 100 samples the interval estimate will enclose the true population parameter. Here α is the area under the curve, distributed equally under...
7.7K
Statistical Significance
20.2K
Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful differences between the two groups. A statistical analysis determines how likely any difference found is due to chance (and thus not meaningful). In psychology, group differences are considered meaningful, or significant, if the odds that these differences occurred by chance alone are 5 percent or less. Stated another way, if we repeated this...
20.2K
