感知与社会经济地位较低的朋友的接触减少了基于社会阶级的排斥
Buse Gönül1,2, Basak Sahin-Acar3, Melanie Killen2
1Department of Psychology, Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Eskişehir, Türkiye.
Developmental science
|August 26, 2023
概括
土耳其的青少年认为基于社会阶级的排除在教育机会之外是不公平的. 具有更高社会经济地位的青少年与更多样化的友更有动力来促进公平.
科学领域:
- 社会心理学 社会心理学
- 发展心理学 发展心理学
- 社会学 社会学 社会学
背景情况:
- 基于社会经济地位 (SES) 的群体间排斥是一个重要的社会问题.
- 了解儿童和青少年如何对这种排斥进行推理对于制定干预措施至关重要.
- 之前的研究还没有充分探讨土耳其经济不稳定的背景下这些动态.
研究的目的:
- 调查儿童和青少年关于基于社会阶级的排除在教育机会之外的推理.
- 检查在排斥和建议解决方案的评估中感知到的集团间接触的作用.
- 为了比较来自不同社会经济背景的儿童和青少年之间的推理.
主要方法:
- 与270名参与者 (142名儿童,128名青少年) 来自土耳其较低和较高社会经济背景的横截面研究.
- 收集关于基于社会阶级的排斥和个人解决方案的感知数据.
- 调节分析探讨了与来自不同SES背景的朋友的感知接触的作用.
主要成果:
- 大多数参与者认为基于社会阶级的排斥是错误的;青少年比儿童更有可能同意.
- 来自较低SES的青少年发现排斥比较高SES的青少年更难接受.
- 较高的SES青少年将排斥与符合权威和现状的期望联系在一起.
- 对于更高的SES青少年,与更低的SES朋友的接触增加减少了排斥的接受度和增加了公平动机.
结论:
- 土耳其的青少年认为基于社会阶级的排除在教育机会之外是不公平的,特别是那些来自较低的SES.
- 对于更高的SES青少年来说,群体间接触在减少排斥的可接受性和促进公平性方面发挥着至关重要的作用.
- 调查结果强调了社会经济背景和群体间接触对社会排斥的道德推理的影响.
更多相关视频
08:24The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
757
11:13The Social Dimension of Stress: Experimental Manipulations of Social Support and Social Identity in the Trier Social Stress Test
Published on: November 19, 2015
13.8K
相关概念视频
Social Facilitation
32.0K
Not all intergroup interactions lead to negative outcomes. Sometimes, being in a group situation can improve performance. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled.
32.0K
Relationship Formation
40.1K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
40.1K
In- and Out-Groups
39.1K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
39.1K
Deindividuation
26.4K
Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.
26.4K
Social Loafing
34.8K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
34.8K
Social Exchange Theory
34.6K
We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
34.6K
