Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

73.9K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
73.9K
Calibration Curves: Linear Least Squares01:20

Calibration Curves: Linear Least Squares

1.4K
A calibration curve is a plot of the instrument's response against a series of known concentrations of a substance. This curve is used to set the instrument response levels, using the substance and its concentrations as standards. Alternatively, or additionally, an equation is fitted to the calibration curve plot and subsequently used to calculate the unknown concentrations of other samples reliably.
For data that follow a straight line, the standard method for fitting is the linear...
1.4K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

11.0K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
11.0K
Instrument Calibration01:12

Instrument Calibration

218
Instrument calibration is essential for ensuring that instruments produce accurate and consistent results. It is vital in manufacturing, healthcare, testing laboratories, and scientific research. Calibration processes are specific to each instrument and help enhance data accuracy. Each instrument has a unique calibration process tailored to its design and function to improve data accuracy.
Analytical Balance Calibration
An analytical balance measures mass and requires regular calibration to...
218
Random Error01:04

Random Error

924
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
924
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

1.5K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
1.5K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Methodological innovations to advance substance use disorder research: Proceedings of a NIDA workshop on target trial emulation and translational testing of digital health tools.

Journal of substance use and addiction treatment·2026
Same author

Factors associated with severe COVID-19 in immunocompromised subgroups in England from 2020 to 2024: an OpenSAFELY cohort study.

EBioMedicine·2026
Same author

The effect of selective decontamination on antimicrobial resistance in intensive care patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Dispensing of benzodiazepines and benzodiazepine-related drugs in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania: a cross-national drug utilisation study.

Nordic journal of psychiatry·2026
Same author

Available guidance for ethical challenges in learning health systems: an integrative literature review.

Health research policy and systems·2026
Same author

Why Analyses of Achieved Sodium Correction Rates in Hyponatremia Studies Do Not Identify Causal (Treatment) Effects.

Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN·2026
Same journal

Measuring neurodevelopment in iron-deficient children in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review of evidence and gaps.

Global epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Women's family planning status in Ethiopia: A geo-additive modeling approach.

Global epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to "Estimation of the global number of nicotine vapers in 2025" [Global Epidemiology 11 (2026) 100257].

Global epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Three little pigs and one big bad wolf: The parable of data sharing in epidemiology.

Global epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Erratum regarding Missing disclaimer statement from Editor [in Chief] on the decision process in previously published articles.

Global epidemiology·2026
Same journal

The first Turks and Caicos Islands global school health survey: Brief findings, challenges, lessons learned, and next steps.

Global epidemiology·2026
查看所有相关文章

相关实验视频

Updated: Jul 18, 2025

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements
10:22

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements

Published on: September 7, 2019

8.3K

通过回归校准和模拟-推算来对随机测量误差进行灵敏度分析.

Linda Nab1, Rolf H H Groenwold1,2

  • 1Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Global epidemiology
|August 28, 2023
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

推回归校准,而不是模拟-外推,用于对随机测量误差的灵敏度分析. 回归校准证明了无偏见的结果和名义置信区间覆盖率,与模拟-外推不同.

关键词:
经典的测量误差是一种测量误差.定量偏见分析分析量化偏见分析.回归校准回归校准的时间.灵敏度分析是一种灵敏度分析.模拟 - 超值推算 模拟-超值推算

更多相关视频

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification ADCI and Dose Estimation
10:33

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification ADCI and Dose Estimation

Published on: September 4, 2017

15.8K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.1K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jul 18, 2025

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements
10:22

Split Point Analysis and Uncertainty Quantification of Thermal-Optical Organic/Elemental Carbon Measurements

Published on: September 7, 2019

8.3K
Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification ADCI and Dose Estimation
10:33

Expedited Radiation Biodosimetry by Automated Dicentric Chromosome Identification ADCI and Dose Estimation

Published on: September 4, 2017

15.8K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.1K

科学领域:

  • 生物统计学 生物统计学
  • 流行病学 流行病学
  • 统计建模 统计建模

背景情况:

  • 对随机测量误差的灵敏度分析在统计建模中至关重要.
  • 回归校准和模拟-推算是当验证数据缺少时进行这种分析的方法.
  • 缺乏对这些敏感性分析方法的直接比较.

研究的目的:

  • 为了比较回归校准和模拟-推算对随机测量误差的灵敏度分析的性能.
  • 为了评估偏差,平均平方误差 (MSE) 和两种方法的置信区间覆盖率.
  • 在没有验证数据的情况下,提供关于方法选择的指导.

主要方法:

  • 进行了一项模拟研究,以比较回归校准和模拟-推算.
  • 该研究评估了线性和逻辑回归模型.
  • 绩效指标包括各种可靠性,样本大小,复制和R平方值的偏差,MSE和信心区间覆盖率.

主要成果:

  • 回归校准产生了公正的结果,中位偏差为0.8%.
  • 模拟外推显示出显著的偏差 (中位数-19.0%) 和较低的置信区间覆盖率 (中位数85%).
  • 模拟外推提供了轻微的效率增长 (较低的MSE中位数),但以准确性和可靠性的代价.

结论:

  • 回归校准是随机测量误差灵敏度分析的首选方法,因为它具有公正性和可靠的置信区间覆盖.
  • 模拟外推,虽然提供边际效率增长,但由于引入偏差和覆盖范围较差,因此不太适合.
  • 这些发现支持在相关的统计分析中常规使用回归校准.