对三个euplotid原生体进行比较基因组分析,可以了解单细胞真核生物体中纳米染色体的进化
Didi Jin1, Chao Li2, Xiao Chen3
1Laboratory of Protozoological Biodiversity and Evolution in Wetland, College of Life Sciences, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, 710119 China.
Marine life science & technology
|August 28, 2023
概括
这项研究揭示了Euplotes aediculatus的大核基因组,详细介绍了其纳米染色体和基因家族. 这些发现显示了Spirotrichea的基因组多样性,并突出了扩大基因家族在适应过程中的潜在作用.
科学领域:
- 基因组学就是基因组学.
- 原生动物学原生动物学.
- 进化生物学 进化生物学
背景情况:
- 螺旋类,一个多样化的状原生动物群,拥有独特的宏核 (MAC) 基因组,其特点是高碎片化成纳米染色体.
- 了解这些纳米染色体的基因组多样性和进化以及螺旋丰富的MAC基因组中的相关基因家族仍然是有限的.
研究的目的:
- 组装和描述一个代表性的euplotid物种*Euplotes aediculatus*的MAC基因组.
- 研究Spirotrichea类内的基因组多样性,纳米染色体进化和基因家族扩展.
主要方法:
- 全基因组测序和*Euplotes aediculatus* MAC基因组的组装.
- 与其他螺旋丰富物种进行基因组比较分析.
- 扩展基因家族的识别和分析以及编程的核糖体框架转移事件.
主要成果:
- *E. aediculatus*的MAC基因组包括35,465个结合体,13,145个完整的纳米染色体和43,194个预测基因,大多数纳米染色体都含有单个基因.
- 观察到GC含量和基因组碎片化的跨种类变异,这表明在进化过程中可能会丢失染色体断裂点.
- 参与基因代谢和FOXO信号通路的基因家族在*E. aediculatus*中得到扩展,表明它们在适应过程中的作用.
- 研究人员发现,编程的核糖体框架转移事件在较长的,多异构基因中更常见.
结论:
- 这项研究为*Euplotes aediculatus*提供了一个全面的基因组资源,为Spirotrichea的纳米染色体结构和进化提供了洞察力.
- 扩大的基因家族表明,E. aediculatus在其环境中的特定适应策略.
- 编程的核糖体框架转移在这个群体内的细胞调节中很重要.
相关概念视频
Diversity of Protists I
35
Excavata is a diverse group of protists that includes both chemoorganotrophic and phototrophic species, with some thriving in anaerobic environments. Among the key groups within Excavata are diplomonads and parabasalids, which are flagellated protists that lack mitochondria and chloroplasts. These microorganisms typically inhabit anoxic environments, such as the intestines of animals, where they exist either symbiotically or as parasites, relying on fermentation for energy production. Some...
35
Comparing Mitochondrial, Chloroplast, and Prokaryotic Genomes
12.5K
The present-day mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes have retained some of the characteristics of their ancestral prokaryotes and also have acquired new attributes during their evolution within eukaryotic cells. Like prokaryotic genomes, mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes neither bind with histone-like proteins nor show complex packaging into chromosome-like structures, as observed in eukaryotes. Unlike mitotic cell divisions observed in eukaryotic cells, mitochondria and chloroplasts...
12.5K
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons
5.8K
Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...
5.8K
Eukaryotic Evolution
35.0K
The endosymbiont theory is the most widely accepted theory of eukaryotic evolution; however, its progression is still somewhat debated. According to the nucleus-first hypothesis, the ancestral prokaryote first evolved a membrane to enclose DNA and form the nucleus. Conversely, the mitochondria-first hypothesis suggests that the nucleus was formed after endosymbiosis of mitochondria.
Contrary to the endosymbiont theory, the eukaryote-first hypothesis proposes that the simpler prokaryotic and...
Contrary to the endosymbiont theory, the eukaryote-first hypothesis proposes that the simpler prokaryotic and...
35.0K
Genome Size and the Evolution of New Genes
8.0K
While every living organism has a genome of some kind (be it RNA, or DNA), there is considerable variation in the sizes of these blueprints. One major factor that impacts genome size is whether the organism is prokaryotic or eukaryotic. In prokaryotes, the genome contains little to no non-coding sequence, such that genes are tightly clustered in groups or operons sequentially along the chromosome. Conversely, the genes in eukaryotes are punctuated by long stretches of non-coding sequence.
8.0K
Diversity of Protists III
48
Rhizaria are a diverse group of unicellular protists characterized by their threadlike cytoplasmic extensions known as pseudopodia. These structures aid in both locomotion and feeding, giving Rhizaria an amoeboid appearance. Their amoeboid morphology once led to taxonomic confusion, but molecular phylogenetics has clarified their evolutionary placement and emphasized their shared use of pseudopodia despite divergent lineages.This clade comprises diverse lineages such as Chlorarachniophyta,...
48


