使用理论为基础的小组流程,即时做出促销决策
概括
基于理论的小组决策增强了基于能力的医学教育 (CBME) 中临床能力委员会 (CCC) 判断的可辩护性. 应用社会决策方案,功能和人群智慧理论可以加强居民准备性评估.
科学领域:
- 医学教育 医学教育
- 评估和评价的评估和评估.
- 决策的心理学 决策的心理学
背景情况:
- 基于能力的医学教育 (CBME) 需要强大的评估计划,以获得成功的培训成果.
- 临床能力委员会 (CCC) 必须提供可辩护的关于居民准备实践的决定,包括晋升和毕业.
- 当前的CCC决策过程可能缺乏理论依据,这可能会影响其结论的有效性.
研究的目的:
- 探索临床能力委员会 (CCC) 组决策过程的理论基础.
- 展示具体理论如何提高研究生医学教育中CCC决策的可辩护性.
- 在现实CBME环境中提供理论应用的实用示例.
主要方法:
- 审查三个相关理论:社会决策方案理论,功能理论和人群智慧.
- 应用这些理论来设计和实施小组决策流程在一个试点住宿计划.
- 评估基于理论的流程对CCC决策可辩护性的影响.
主要成果:
- 社会决策方案理论,功能理论和群众智慧的应用为CCC审议提供了结构化的框架.
- 这种理论依据增加了有关居民准备的集团决策的感知和实际可辩护性.
- 试点研究表明,理论应用与CCC判决的有效性论证的改进之间存在切实的联系.
结论:
- 理论框架对于加强基于能力的医学教育 (CBME) 中临床能力委员会 (CCC) 组决策的有效性和可辩护性至关重要.
- 整合诸如社会决策方案,功能理论和人群智慧等理论,为提高居民评估提供了实际策略.
- 这种方法可以作为其他居住计划的典范,旨在加强其评估有效性并捍卫学习者进步决策.
相关概念视频
Groupthink
44.4K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
44.4K
In- and Out-Groups
39.1K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
39.1K
Social Proof
27.7K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.7K
Group Polarization
34.3K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
34.3K
Routes of Persuasion
64.2K
Persuasion is the process of changing our attitude toward something based on some kind of communication. Much of the persuasion we experience comes from outside forces. How do people convince others to change their attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors? What communications do you receive that attempt to persuade you to change your attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors?
64.2K
Social Loafing
34.8K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
34.8K


