Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Variability: Analysis01:11

Variability: Analysis

158
Measures of variability are statistical metrics that reveal the dispersion pattern within a dataset. They are pivotal in biostatistics, providing insights into the heterogeneity within health and biological data. Variability signifies the degree to which data points diverge from one another, helping researchers understand the potential range of values and associated uncertainty within the data.
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
158
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

7.0K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
7.0K
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

188
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
188
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

11.0K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
11.0K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

349
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
349
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

222
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
222

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Semi-automated forensic examination of handwritten character loops.

Forensic science international·2026
Same author

Statistical methodologies for absolute and relative efficacy assessment based on single-arm trials: a scoping review.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same author

LIVERATION trial: a multicentre European randomised study on radiofrequency margin coagulation and its impact on oncological outcomes after liver surgery - study protocol.

BMJ open·2025
Same author

Antiepileptic Drugs for De Novo Seizure Prevention After Craniotomy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Current Evidence.

Journal of clinical medicine·2025
Same author

Optimising clinical trial methods for complex regional pain syndrome: a methodological framework (OptiMeth-CRPS).

Pain reports·2025
Same author

What components and formats of rehabilitation interventions are more effective to reduce pain in patients with cervical radiculopathy? A Systematic review and component network meta-analysis.

Clinical rehabilitation·2025

相关实验视频

Updated: Jul 17, 2025

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

582

通过随机搜索变量选择在网络元分析中的不一致性识别.

Georgios Seitidis1, Stavros Nikolakopoulos2,3, Ioannis Ntzoufras4

  • 1Department of Primary Education, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.

Statistics in medicine
|August 31, 2023
PubMed
概括

本研究引入了一种新方法,即随机搜索不一致因素选择 (SSIFS),用于评估网络元分析 (NMA) 的一致性. SSIFS使用变量选择来识别和量化治疗比较中的不一致性,提高可靠性.

关键词:
没有NMA,没有NMA.这是SSVS的SSVS.一致性的一致性过渡性的过渡性.选择变量的选择变量.

更多相关视频

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.9K
Barnes Maze Testing Strategies with Small and Large Rodent Models
12:59

Barnes Maze Testing Strategies with Small and Large Rodent Models

Published on: February 26, 2014

42.1K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jul 17, 2025

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

582
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.9K
Barnes Maze Testing Strategies with Small and Large Rodent Models
12:59

Barnes Maze Testing Strategies with Small and Large Rodent Models

Published on: February 26, 2014

42.1K

科学领域:

  • 生物统计学 生物统计学
  • 证据综合 证据综合
  • 卫生研究方法论 卫生研究方法论

背景情况:

  • 网络元分析 (NMA) 的可靠性取决于过渡性假设,需要在所有比较中进行类似的效果修饰器分布.
  • 统计的一致性,即直接和间接证据一致,是过渡性的一个关键表现.
  • 评估一致性的现有方法往往涉及将不一致性因素添加到NMA模型中.

研究的目的:

  • 提出一种新的方法,即随机搜索不一致因素选择 (SSIFS),用于评估网络元分析中的一致性假设.
  • 通过使用可变选择技术,在当地和全球评估不一致性.
  • 根据历史NMA数据,制定一个信息化的网络一致性预先.

主要方法:

  • SSIFS使用通过变量选择技术选择的候选共变量来描述不一致性因素.
  • 该方法应用了随机搜索变量选择来确定不一致因素的包含.
  • 后置包含概率量化了在特定比较中不一致的可能性,后置模型赔率或中位数概率模型的帮助下做出决定.

主要成果:

  • 拟议的SSIFS方法有效评估网络元分析的一致性.
  • 它量化了特定治疗比较不一致的可能性.
  • 该方法结合了直接和间接证据之间的差异,并利用基于201个公布的NMA的信息先验.

结论:

  • SSIFS提供了一种强大的方法来评估网络元分析的一致性,提高综合证据的可靠性.
  • 该方法提供了一种数据驱动的方式来识别和量化不一致.
  • 在CRAN上,SSIFS方法作为R包可用.