Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

147
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
147
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

349
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
349
Hazard Ratio01:12

Hazard Ratio

155
The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial...
155
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

363
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
363
Introduction to Epidemiology01:26

Introduction to Epidemiology

772
Epidemiology, known as the cornerstone of public health, involves studying the distribution and determinants of health-related events in defined populations and applying these insights to control health issues. This is essential for understanding how diseases spread, identifying populations at greater risk, and implementing measures to control or prevent outbreaks. Epidemiology addresses not only infectious diseases but also non-communicable conditions like cancer and cardiovascular disease,...
772
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

222
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
222

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Enteral Iron Supplementation.

Neonatal network : NN·2026
Same author

Ondansetron: A Novel Treatment to Reduce the Severity of Neonatal Opioid Withdrawal Syndrome?

Neonatal network : NN·2025
Same author

Second-Line Medications for Neonatal Opioid Withdrawal Syndrome/Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome.

Neonatal network : NN·2025
Same author

The Evidence-Based Practice Process Steps 4, 5, and 6: Integration, Evaluation, and Dissemination.

Neonatal network : NN·2024
Same author

Step 3: Critical Appraisal of Evidence-Expert Opinion.

Neonatal network : NN·2024
Same author

Step 3: Critically Appraising Evidence: Quality Improvement Projects.

Neonatal network : NN·2023

相关实验视频

Updated: Jul 17, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.1K

步骤3:批判性地评估证据:案例对照研究

Susan Givens Bell

    Neonatal network : NN
    |September 1, 2023
    PubMed
    概括
    此摘要是机器生成的。

    学习如何批判性地评估案例控制研究,这是基于证据的实践 (EBP) 的关键步骤. 本指南侧重于评估病例控制研究的质量和有效性,以获得更好的医疗保健决策.

    关键词:
    一个案例的案例.个案控制研究研究.控制 控制 控制 控制基于证据的实践实践.证据的证据水平.有关定量证据的量化证据.

    更多相关视频

    How to Administer Near-Infrared Spectroscopy in Critically ill Neonates, Infants, and Children
    07:27

    How to Administer Near-Infrared Spectroscopy in Critically ill Neonates, Infants, and Children

    Published on: August 19, 2020

    11.5K
    Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
    06:55

    Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

    Published on: January 8, 2020

    14.5K

    相关实验视频

    Last Updated: Jul 17, 2025

    An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
    05:37

    An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

    Published on: September 16, 2022

    2.1K
    How to Administer Near-Infrared Spectroscopy in Critically ill Neonates, Infants, and Children
    07:27

    How to Administer Near-Infrared Spectroscopy in Critically ill Neonates, Infants, and Children

    Published on: August 19, 2020

    11.5K
    Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
    06:55

    Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

    Published on: January 8, 2020

    14.5K

    科学领域:

    • 医学研究方法论医学研究方法论.
    • 流行病学 流行病学
    • 生物统计学 生物统计学

    背景情况:

    • 基于证据的实践 (EBP) 对于明智的临床决策至关重要.
    • 批判性评估是EBP过程中的第三个重要步骤.
    • 了解研究设计对于有效的证据评估至关重要.

    研究的目的:

    • 为对病例控制研究的批判性评估提供一个专注的指南.
    • 增强读者评估案例控制研究质量的能力.
    • 支持EBP原则在临床实践中的应用.

    主要方法:

    • 本文是详细介绍批判性评价过程的系列文章中的第四篇.
    • 它特别讨论了评估案例控制研究设计的方法.
    • 讨论了病例控制研究的关键评估点.

    主要成果:

    • 病例控制研究对于调查罕见疾病和暴露非常有价值.
    • 适当的批判性评估可以识别病例控制研究中的潜在偏见和局限性.
    • 有效的评估确保了在临床实践中可靠地使用研究结果.

    结论:

    • 对病例控制研究的批判性评估是医疗保健专业人员必需的技能.
    • 掌握这种技能可以加强基于证据的实践的基础.
    • 准确的评估导致更有效和更安全的患者护理.