Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Obedience01:08

Obedience

32.9K
According to obedience research, we may harm others under the forceful pressures of an authority figure (Milgram, 1974). How about if the inappropriate orders were delivered with less force? The increasing interdependence between nurses and physicians compelled Hofling and his colleagues to explore nurses’ reactions to a potentially harmful medical request made by the perceived authority figure, the doctor (Hofling, Brotzman, Dalrymple, Graves, & Pierce, 1966). In this situation,...
32.9K
Ethical Issues01:27

Ethical Issues

1.0K
Nurses are essential in patient care, upholding the ethical principles of their profession and effectively navigating ethical dilemmas. Neglecting ethical issues can lead to inadequate patient care, compromised therapeutic relationships, and moral distress among healthcare workers.
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
1.0K
Censoring Survival Data01:09

Censoring Survival Data

125
Survival analysis is a statistical method used to analyze time-to-event data, often employed in fields such as medicine, engineering, and social sciences. One of the key challenges in survival analysis is dealing with incomplete data, a phenomenon known as "censoring." Censoring occurs when the event of interest (such as death, relapse, or system failure) has not occurred for some individuals by the end of the study period or is otherwise unobservable, and it might have many different...
125
Groupthink01:34

Groupthink

44.4K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
44.4K
The Stanford Prison Experiment03:20

The Stanford Prison Experiment

23.3K
The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
23.3K
Milgram's Obedience to Authority02:20

Milgram's Obedience to Authority

6.4K
Obedience to authority is classically demonstrated in a more famous series of social psychology experiments performed by Stanley Milgram. He was a social psychology professor at Yale who was influenced by the trial of Adolf Eichmann, a Nazi war criminal. Eichmann’s defense for the atrocities he committed was that he was “just following orders.”
6.4K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

How "America First" Abandoned Global Health: The Case for an African Model.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2026
Same author

Normalising transparency: an argument for requiring generative AI use declarations in all manuscripts-with a call for commentaries.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same author

"It's an Uphill Battle. We Have a Long Way to Go": Perspectives of Canadian Individuals Living with Genetic Conditions Detectable by Prenatal Cell-Free DNA Screening.

AJOB empirical bioethics·2026
Same author

Epidemiology of Intensive Nutritional Interventions and Restraints in Hospitalizations for Anorexia Nervosa: Annual National Trends of the United States.

The International journal of eating disorders·2026
Same author

Bioethics and the World Order: A Curious Coincidence Between Chinese and African Approaches.

Developing world bioethics·2026
Same author

Navigating the discourse on the use of social robot Pepper: ethical and practical implications.

BMC geriatrics·2026

相关实验视频

Updated: Jul 17, 2025

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

11.7K

学术自由受到围攻

Nancy S Jecker1,2,3, Marcel Verweij4, Vardit Ravitsky5

  • 1Department of Bioethics & Humanities, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA nsjecker@uw.edu.

Journal of medical ethics
|September 1, 2023
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

由于政治干预,全球学术自由正在下降. 坚持道德,正义和公平是对抗这些威胁和确保公平的知识追求至关重要的.

关键词:
文化多样性 文化多样性伦理学 伦理学 伦理学国际性的国际性少数群体 少数群体政治 政策 政策 政策

更多相关视频

Improving Student Outcomes with an Adaptable Molecular Cloning Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience
10:17

Improving Student Outcomes with an Adaptable Molecular Cloning Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience

Published on: November 15, 2024

1.1K
How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry
14:34

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry

Published on: November 10, 2010

75.4K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jul 17, 2025

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

11.7K
Improving Student Outcomes with an Adaptable Molecular Cloning Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience
10:17

Improving Student Outcomes with an Adaptable Molecular Cloning Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience

Published on: November 15, 2024

1.1K
How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry
14:34

How to Create and Use Binocular Rivalry

Published on: November 10, 2010

75.4K

科学领域:

  • 社会科学 社会科学 社会科学
  • 伦理学 伦理学 伦理学
  • 高等教育研究 高等教育研究

背景情况:

  • 全球学术自由受到政治干预的威胁.
  • 核心学术功能越来越受到影响.
  • 在应对这些挑战时,道德考虑至关重要.

研究的目的:

  • 描述学术自由下降的全球模式.
  • 在学术追求中争辩道德,正义和公平的重要性.
  • 作为一个案例研究,检查卡塔尔大学为世界生物伦理学大会的选择.

主要方法:

  • 对学术自由的全球趋势进行描述性分析.
  • 伦理论证侧重于正义和公平.
  • 一个特定事件的案例研究分析 (世界生物伦理学大会的选择).

主要成果:

  • 一个明显的全球模式减少学术自由存在.
  • 政治干预是这种衰退的一个重要驱动因素.
  • 公平与正义是追求知识的基本伦理标准.

结论:

  • 应对对学术自由的威胁需要强烈强调道德,正义和公平.
  • 对不同群体的公平代表和机会至关重要.
  • 会议和学术聚会必须积极解决和减轻所产生的不公正.