赢家-输家效应提高了具有相同资源持有权力的竞争对手之间的社交网络效率
M Hermanussen1, M Dammhahn2, C Scheffler3
1, Eckernförde-Altenhof, Germany.
Scientific reports
|September 2, 2023
概括
国家依赖的反,就像赢家-输家效应一样,推动了动物统治层次的自我组织. 这一过程创造了集中式的社会网络,模仿由基石个人形成的结构,使个人和团体受益.
科学领域:
- 动物行为和社会网络分析.
- 理论生态学和进化生物学.
- 社会系统的计算建模.
背景情况:
- 主导层次结构 (DH) 是动物社会的基础,结构化社会相互作用.
- 图形理论为分析DH作为社交网络提供了一个框架.
- 了解DH结构的出现是理解社会组织的关键.
研究的目的:
- 研究依赖国家反 (获胜者-失败者效应) 对主导结构形成的影响.
- 为了比较随机比赛导致的DH与受赢家-输家动态影响的DH.
- 分析模拟的统治层次结构的网络属性.
主要方法:
- 蒙特卡洛模拟对对进行的激烈竞争.
- 在资源持有力 (RHP) 中具有和没有先前存在的差异的个体建模.
- 使用网络理论指标 (例如,过渡性,集中) 分析统治结构.
主要成果:
- 随机竞赛 (Null变异) 产生了具有低过渡性的随机DH.
- 国家依赖的反 (获胜者-失败者变体) 产生了集中的"明星"结构.
- 模拟DH与反紧密匹配的模式观察到在自然动物等级.
结论:
- 国家依赖的反对于强大的统治层次结构的自我组织至关重要.
- 通过反自组织的DH类似于由基石个体形成的等级体系.
- 集中式的社交网络提供了进化优势,促进了个人和团体的效率.
相关概念视频
Relationship Formation
40.1K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
40.1K
Social Loafing
34.8K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
34.8K
Competition
21.7K
When organisms require the same limited resources within an environment, they may have to compete for them. Competition is a net-negative interaction. Even if two competing individuals or populations do not interact directly, the overall fitness of both competitors is lowered as a result of not having full access to the limited resource.
21.7K
Social Exchange Theory
34.6K
We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
34.6K
Social Facilitation
32.0K
Not all intergroup interactions lead to negative outcomes. Sometimes, being in a group situation can improve performance. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled.
32.0K
In- and Out-Groups
39.1K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
39.1K


