跨研究地点的症状报告异质性:随机对照的多中心抗疟疾试验的二次分析

Kamala Thriemer1, Robert James Commons2,3, Megha Rajasekhar4

  • 1Global and Tropical Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research and Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Australia. Kamala.ley-thriemer@menzies.edu.au.

PubMed
概括

研究性药物试验显示,在研究地点,患者报告症状的差异很大,特别是轻度症状. 治疗组之间的症状的相对差异比绝对数字更可靠.

相关概念视频

Test for Homogeneity01:23

Test for Homogeneity

The goodness–of–fit test can be used to decide whether a population fits a given distribution, but it will not suffice to decide whether two populations follow the same unknown distribution. A different test, called the test for homogeneity, can be used to conclude whether two populations have the same distribution. To calculate the test statistic for a test for homogeneity, follow the same procedure as with the test of independence. The hypotheses for the test for homogeneity can...
2.0K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
349
Pharmacovigilance01:19

Pharmacovigilance

Post-marketing surveillance is a critical component of pharmaceutical regulation, often uncovering unanticipated adverse drug reactions (ADRs) once a drug is widely used over an extended period.
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
886