旋转交叉材料的过渡温度与平均值组合 Hubbard-U 校正
Angel Albavera-Mata1,2, Richard G Hennig1,2, S B Trickey1,3
1Center for Molecular Magnetic Quantum Materials, Quantum Theory Project, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, United States.
The journal of physical chemistry. A
|September 5, 2023
概括
计算旋转交叉过渡温度 (T1/2) 是复杂的. 这项研究改进了使用Hubbard-U校正和近似方法的方法,通过成本有效的密度功能理论来实现材料选的准确结果.
科学领域:
- 计算化学计算化学
- 材料科学 材料科学 材料科学
- 固态物理 固态物理
背景情况:
- 在冷凝相中精确计算旋转交叉 (SCO) 过渡温度 (T1/2) 在计算上具有挑战性.
- 准确的亚流动交叉能量差异 (ΔE_HL) 和贡献对于预测SCO行为至关重要.
- 现有的密度函数近似 (DFA) 难以平衡SCO材料的精度和计算成本.
研究的目的:
- 调查哈伯德-U校正和贡献对SCO热化学性质的影响.
- 开发一种计算效率高,准确的方法来计算SCO材料的T1/2.
- 通过将低计算成本与可靠的预测相结合,使SCO材料的高通量选成为可能.
主要方法:
- 采用了从20个SCO材料的参考集合旋转状态中获得的Hubbard-U校正.
- 使用了第一个协调球的近似方法,并假定外部原子的类似振动贡献.
- 比较了PBE通用梯度DFA与r2SCAN元通用梯度DFA的性能.
主要成果:
- 哈伯德-U校正,特别是从简单的表示,可以过度纠正 ΔE_HL,导致减少 T1/2 值.
- 使用PBE-DFA的拟议方法实现了T1/2结果,与计算成本更高的r2SCAN DFA相美.
- 简化方法有效地捕捉了SCO材料的基本热化学特性.
结论:
- 结合PBE-DFA与特定近似和Hubbard-U校正的计算效率高的方法使得准确的T1/2预测成为可能.
- 这种方法为旋转交叉材料的高通量计算选提供了一个有希望的途径.
- 这些发现减少了对SCO材料表征的计算密集型方法的依赖.
更多相关视频
相关概念视频
Atomic Nuclei: Nuclear Spin State Population Distribution
1.0K
Near absolute zero temperatures, in the presence of a magnetic field, the majority of nuclei prefer the lower energy spin-up state to the higher energy spin-down state. As temperatures increase, the energy from thermal collisions distributes the spins more equally between the two states. The Boltzmann distribution equation gives the ratio of the number of spins predicted in the spin −½ (N−) and spin +½ (N+) states.
1.0K
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview
958
In bromoethane, the three methyl protons are coupled to the two methylene protons that are three bonds away. In accordance with the n+1 rule, the signal from the methyl protons is split into three peaks with 1:2:1 relative intensities. The methylene protons appear as a quartet, with the relative intensities of 1:3:3:1.
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
958
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
1.0K
Coupling interactions are strongest between NMR-active nuclei bonded to each other, where spin information can be transmitted directly through the pair of bonding electrons. While nuclei polarize their electrons to the opposite spins, the bonding electron pair has opposite spins. Configurations with antiparallel nuclear spins are expected to be lower in energy. When coupling makes antiparallel states more favorable, J is considered to have a positive value. The one-bond coupling constant, 1J,...
1.0K
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
1.1K
Vicinal or three-bond coupling is commonly observed between protons attached to adjacent carbons. Here, nuclear spin information is primarily transferred via electron spin interactions between adjacent C‑H bond orbitals. This generally favors the antiparallel arrangement of spins, so 3J values are usually positive.
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the...
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the...
1.1K
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
1.1K
Two NMR-active nuclei bonded to a central atom can be involved in geminal or two-bond coupling. Geminal coupling is commonly seen between diastereotopic protons in chiral molecules and unsymmetrical alkenes, among others.
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
1.1K
Thermodynamic Potentials
874
Thermodynamic potentials are state functions that are extremely useful in analyzing a thermodynamic system. They have dimensions of energy. The four important thermodynamic potentials are internal energy, enthalpy, Helmholtz free energy, and Gibbs free energy. These thermodynamic potentials can be expressed using two of the following variables: pressure, volume, temperature, and entropy. These two variables are expressed as the rate of change of the thermodynamic potential with respect to other...
874


