不相关的信息增强了知识的感觉,并诅咒了我们对其他思想的理解
Miao Zhong1, Carrey Tik Sze Siu2, Him Cheung1
1Department of Psychology, Education University of Hong Kong.
Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
|September 7, 2023
概括
接触不相关但相关的信息会增加对他人知识的信心和估计. 这种由语义相关性驱动的效应增加了感知理解,而不改变实际知识.
科学领域:
- 认知心理学 认知心理学
- 社会认知是指社会认知.
- 信息处理 信息处理
背景情况:
- 了解外部信息如何影响自我认知和社会判断至关重要.
- "知识的诅咒"描述了难以想象其他人缺乏自己的知识.
- 以前的研究还没有充分探讨不相关信息如何影响知识估计.
研究的目的:
- 调查暴露于与主题相关的无关信息是否会影响对自己和同行知识的估计.
- 确定这种效应背后的机制,包括语义相关性和检索流性.
- 检查信心在调解无关信息对知识估计的影响中的作用.
主要方法:
- 参与者在接触了与主题相关的非诊断信息后,回答了一般知识问题.
- 实验对不相关信息的存在和性质进行了变化.
- 在一些实验中测量了响应延迟,以评估检索流性.
- 使用统计调解分析来测试信心的作用.
主要成果:
- 不相关的,与主题相关的信息显著增加了对自己知识和对同行知识估计的信心.
- 这种效果取决于不相关信息与问题的语义相关性.
- 不相关信息对同行知识估计的影响是由对自身知识的信心增加所介导的.
- 检索流性没有明确解释观察到的效应.
结论:
- 不相关的信息通过语义关联增强个人和社会感知知识.
- 增加的自信是膨胀的同行知识估计的主要驱动力.
- 这种现象超越了传统的"知识诅咒",通过展示外部数据如何塑造社会认知.
更多相关视频
12:12Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm
Published on: May 14, 2014
10.6K
08:24The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
742
相关概念视频
Cause and Effect
10.9K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
10.9K
Fundamental Attribution Error
12.9K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
12.9K
Cognitivism
1.4K
Cognitive psychology emerged as a significant field in the mid-20th century. It focused on understanding humans' internal mental processes. This approach emphasizes how people perceive, remember, think, and solve problems—elements critical to human cognition.
Previously dominated by behaviorism, which prioritized observable behaviors and largely ignored mental processes, psychology transformed in the 1950s. Cognitive psychologists argue that understanding how we think and process...
Previously dominated by behaviorism, which prioritized observable behaviors and largely ignored mental processes, psychology transformed in the 1950s. Cognitive psychologists argue that understanding how we think and process...
1.4K
Confirmation Biases
5.5K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
5.5K
Factors Affecting Perception
1.6K
Perception is influenced by perceptual set, context, motivation, and emotion. Perceptual set, or perceptual expectancy, refers to the tendency to perceive things in a particular way, influenced by previous experiences and expectations. This phenomenon affects the interpretation of stimuli, creating a set of mental tendencies and assumptions that impact sensory perceptions of sound, taste, touch, and sight.
An illustrative example of a perceptual set is the scenario where an airline pilot told...
An illustrative example of a perceptual set is the scenario where an airline pilot told...
1.6K
Reason and Intuition
6.5K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.5K
