相关实验视频
Updated: Jul 16, 2025

06:48
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
Published on: January 19, 2019
9.4K
多数规则可以帮助解决困难的任务,即使自信的成员选择不服务个人利益
Kiri Kuroda1,2, Mayu Takahashi3,2, Tatsuya Kameda4,5,6
1Center for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Lentzeallee 94, 14195, Berlin, Germany.
Scientific reports
|September 8, 2023
概括
即使有选择加入/退出决定,多数规则也有效地解决了困难的问题. 在不确定的情况下,个人利益仍然可以与集团决策表现平衡.
科学领域:
- 决策科学 决策科学
- 认知心理学 认知心理学
- 社会动态 社会动态
背景情况:
- 自信和能力强的个人通常会为团队目标做出贡献,提高决策绩效.
- 当成员可以选择加入/退出并优先考虑个人利益时,集团决策的有效性尚不清楚.
研究的目的:
- 调查个人因素如何影响在小组任务中选择退出的决定.
- 分析选择/退出机制对不同任务难度的集团决策准确性的影响.
- 了解多数制在不确定性下协商一致决策中的功能和民主作用.
主要方法:
- 一个实验室实验与63名参与者和认知建模.
- 从实验参与者重新抽取的虚拟组 (25名成员) 的分析.
- 引导式模拟分析,以分解群体规模和选民准确性的影响.
主要成果:
- 个人信心,能力和风险偏好影响了选择退出的决定.
- 选择参与的参与者的多数决策在轻松任务中低于个人决策.
- 选择参与者的多数决策在困难任务中表现优于个人决策.
结论:
- 选择/退出机制和任务难度相互作用,影响集团决策的准确性.
- 对于解决具有挑战性的问题,即使在优先考虑个人利益的情况下,多数制仍然是功能性和民主的.
- 在不确定性下的共识决策尽管是个人主义的选择,但可以强大.
相关概念视频
Decision Making: Traditional Method
4.0K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.0K
Groupthink
44.4K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
44.4K
Problem-Solving
192
Effective problem-solving consists of two steps: 1. identifying the problem and 2. selecting the appropriate problem-solving strategy (i.e., a plan of action used to find a solution). Humans use four problem-solving strategies:
192
Robbers Cave
14.3K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.3K
Decision Making
140
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
140
Social Loafing
34.8K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
34.8K

