在情境因素研究和基于力量的操纵中确定优先差距. 一个国际和跨学科的德尔菲研究研究
David Griswold1, Ken Learman1, Giacomo Rossettini2
1Department of Graduate Studies in Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Youngstown State University, Youngstown, OH, USA.
The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy
|September 12, 2023
概括
这项德尔菲研究确定了16个重点研究缺口在情境因素 (CFs) 和基于力量的操纵 (FBM). 这些发现为CF和FBM的未来研究方向建立了共识.
科学领域:
- 生物力学 生物力学
- 康复科学 康复科学 康复科学
- 人类因素工程 人类因素工程
背景情况:
- 情境因素 (CF) 显著影响基于力量的操纵 (FBM) 的结果.
- 识别CF和FBM的研究差距对于推进该领域至关重要.
- 之前的研究并没有系统地就这些优先级差距建立共识.
研究的目的:
- 确定与上下文因素 (CF) 和基于力量的操纵 (FBM) 相关的优先研究差距.
- 达成国际和跨学科的共识,在未来的CF和FBM研究中研究的关键领域.
主要方法:
- 与国际和跨学科的CF和FBM专家进行了三轮的Delphi研究.
- 专家小组成员根据复合分数对优先级差距进行了排名,共识值≥75%.
- 统计分析,包括威尔科克森等级总和测试,评估了回合之间的响应一致性.
主要成果:
- 四十六名小组成员参加了所有三轮的讨论.
- 在CF和FBM研究中,在19个确定优先差距中的16个问题上达成共识.
- 结果显示一致性和稳定性,来自威尔科克森等级和和测试的P值非显著 (P > .05).
结论:
- 本研究提供了基于共识的优先研究缺口列表,其中包括情境因素和基于力量的操纵.
- 发现的差距是未来该领域的研究调查和战略规划的基础.
- 这些发现促进了有针对性的研究努力,以提高FBM中CF的理解和应用.
更多相关视频
14:43A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
11.9K
08:24The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
742
相关概念视频
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
119
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
119
Factorial Design
13.1K
Factorial Analysis is an experimental design that applies Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) statistical procedures to examine a change in a dependent variable due to more than one independent variable, also known as factors. Changes in worker productivity can be reasoned, for example, to be influenced by salary and other conditions, such as skill level. One way to test this hypothesis is by categorizing salary into three levels (low, moderate, and high) and skills sets into two levels (entry level...
13.1K
Deindividuation
26.4K
Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.
26.4K
Social Proof
27.7K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.7K
Cross-Sectional Research
11.4K
In cross-sectional research, a researcher compares multiple segments of the population at the same time. If they were interested in people's dietary habits, the researcher might directly compare different groups of people by age. Instead of following a group of people for 20 years to see how their dietary habits changed from decade to decade, the researcher would study a group of 20-year-old individuals and compare them to a group of 30-year-old individuals and a group of 40-year-old...
11.4K
Relationship Formation
40.1K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
40.1K
