临床研究实施对数据质量评估的影响 - - 用相互依赖的健康数据项目中的矛盾作为试点指标
Khalid O Yusuf1, Irina Chaplinskaya-Sobol1, Anne Schoneberg1
1Department of Medical Informatics, University Medical Center Göttingen, Germany.
Studies in health technology and informatics
|September 12, 2023
概括
确保完整的元数据,就像测量方法一样,对于准确的健康数据矛盾评估至关重要. 研究设计和数据采集系统必须包括这些细节,以提高数据质量.
科学领域:
- 医疗信息学 医疗信息学
- 数据质量管理数据质量管理
- 临床数据标准 临床数据标准
背景情况:
- 对矛盾的评估对于评估健康数据可信度至关重要.
- 现有的方法需要额外的元数据来确定结论,例如测量背景 (例如,口腔与直肠温度).
- 研究设计必须确保有明确的数据项可用于准确的矛盾检查.
研究的目的:
- 调查研究数据库实施对健康数据矛盾评估的影响.
- 为了确定必要的元数据和评估电子案例报告表 (eCRF),检查实施情况.
- 提高相互依存的健康数据质量指标的可靠性.
主要方法:
- 确定了用于矛盾检查的基本信息:时间,测量方法,单位和相互依赖规则.
- 给这些参数分配分数以进行评估.
- 根据对选定相互依赖的数据项集的要求满足,评估了两项研究.
主要成果:
- 两项研究都没有完全满足结论性的矛盾评估的所有要求.
- 时间和单位存在,但缺乏测量方法阻碍了评估.
- 实施的数据输入检查仅对直接输入的数据进行了观察.
结论:
- 结论性的矛盾评估需要背景元数据以及捕获的数据.
- 将元数据考虑因素整合到研究设计和数据采集系统中,可以提高数据质量.
- 这些实践可以增强初级卫生信息系统中的临床文档.
更多相关视频
06:55Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
14.5K
15:00Setup of Consumer Wearable Devices for Exposure and Health Monitoring in Population Studies
Published on: February 3, 2023
2.5K
相关概念视频
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
147
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
147
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
343
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
343
Data Validation
5.1K
Data validation is an essential part of a comprehensive assessment. Validation is confirming or verifying and opening the door to gathering more assessment data as it clarifies vague or unclear data. The process of checking and verifying the collected information is called data validation. The primary purpose of data validation is to ensure data is as free from error, bias, and misinterpretation as possible.
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
5.1K
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
188
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
188
Study Designs in Epidemiology
263
Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
263
Reliability and Validity
12.8K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
12.8K
