抽象的社会路线:互动和多样性提高绩效和转移在基于规则的分类任务任务
Kristian Tylén1,2, Riccardo Fusaroli1,2,3, Sara Møller Østergaard1
1Department of Linguistics, Cognitive Science and Semiotics, Aarhus University.
Cognitive science
|September 14, 2023
概括
社交互动显著提高抽象思维和解决问题的技能. 群体通过有效地识别基本规则来胜过个人和代理人,证明了协作认知的力量.
科学领域:
- 认知科学 认知科学
- 社会心理学 社会心理学
- 人工智能的人工智能
背景情况:
- 抽象思维和解决问题的能力是人类认知的基础.
- 这些能力有助于在不同环境中转移知识.
- 社交互动,对话和共同关注可能对复杂的推理至关重要.
研究的目的:
- 调查社交互动是否能提高规则诱导和解决问题的表现.
- 为了比较群体与个人在认知任务上的表现.
- 探索社会动态和认知结果之间的关系.
主要方法:
- 一项实验性研究,涉及个人和团体在三个复杂度级别上执行视觉分类任务.
- 使用转移任务来评估学习规则的概括性.
- 参与者的行为与使用模拟学习的模拟代理进行了比较.
主要成果:
- 与个人和代理商相比,在培训和转移任务中,小组表现优越.
- 随着任务的复杂性增加,小组概括的准确性增加了.
- 群体对话中的语义多样性预测了表现变化,将社会互动与认知多样性和抽象联系起来.
结论:
- 社交互动增强了诸如规则诱导之类的认知过程,从而提高了解决问题的能力.
- 协作式学习和群体内的多样化视角促进了更有效的抽象.
- 这些发现突出了社会动态在高阶认知功能中的关键作用.
更多相关视频
14:38Creating Objects and Object Categories for Studying Perception and Perceptual Learning
Published on: November 2, 2012
11.9K
05:35Experience is Instrumental in Tuning a Link Between Language and Cognition: Evidence from 6- to 7- Month-Old Infants' Object Categorization
Published on: April 19, 2017
6.7K
相关概念视频
Stereotype Content Model
14.8K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.8K
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
90.2K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
90.2K
How Data are Classified: Categorical Data
33.9K
A variable, usually notated by capital letters such as X and Y, is a characteristic or measurement that can be determined for each member of a population. Data are the actual values of variables. They may be numbers, or they may be words. Datum is a single value.
Data are classified based on whether they are measurable or not. Categorical data cannot be measured; instead, it can be divided into categories. For example, if Y denotes a person's party affiliation, some examples of Y include...
Data are classified based on whether they are measurable or not. Categorical data cannot be measured; instead, it can be divided into categories. For example, if Y denotes a person's party affiliation, some examples of Y include...
33.9K
Robbers Cave
14.3K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.3K
Relationship Formation
40.1K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
40.1K
In- and Out-Groups
39.1K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
39.1K
