Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

6.5K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.5K
The Availability Heuristic01:08

The Availability Heuristic

6.0K
A heuristic is a general problem-solving framework (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). You can think of these as mental shortcuts that are used to solve problems. Different types of heuristics are used in different types of situations, and the impulse to use a heuristic occurs when one of five conditions is met (Pratkanis, 1989):
6.0K
Framing Effects03:26

Framing Effects

7.4K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
7.4K
Timing and Consequences on Behavior01:08

Timing and Consequences on Behavior

117
In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective. 
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
117
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

7.3K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.3K
Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance01:14

Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance

110
Avoidance-avoidance conflict refers to a psychological situation where a person must choose between two or more unpleasant alternatives. These conflicts are particularly stressful because neither option is desirable. This dilemma is often expressed in sayings like "caught between a rock and a hard place" or "between the devil and the deep blue sea." For instance, individuals who fear dental procedures may find themselves torn between enduring a painful toothache or facing the...
110

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

A cooperative-competitive perspective of ownership necessitates an understanding of ownership disagreements.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2023
Same author

Psychological ownership interventions increase interest in claiming government benefits.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2021
Same journal

Outgroup friendships and social influence in the development of adolescent attitudes toward secondary outgroups.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2026
Same journal

The impact of "relational" Artificial Intelligence on human well-being: A self-determination theory analysis.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2026
Same journal

Is my loneliness killing me? Effects of loneliness and social isolation on transitions between cognitive status categories and death.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2026
Same journal

Listening across the divide: High-quality listening promotes speakers' state well-being through basic psychological need satisfaction during disagreements.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2026
Same journal

Morality cut both ways: The role of cognition and emotion in attitude moralization and demoralization.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2026
Same journal

The predictive validity of vocational interests for life outcomes across adulthood.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2026
查看所有相关文章

相关实验视频

Updated: Jul 16, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

742

稀缺性和时间间的选择

Eesha Sharma1, Stephanie M Tully2, Xiang Wang3

  • 1Department of Marketing, Fowler College of Business, San Diego State University.

Journal of personality and social psychology
|September 14, 2023
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

稀缺性影响决策,但并不总是冲动的. 受到威胁的需求的时间地平线,而不仅仅是近视,在稀缺的情况下塑造了选择,引导人们做出适合环境的决定.

更多相关视频

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
07:47

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Published on: January 9, 2016

15.4K
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

8.7K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jul 16, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

742
Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
07:47

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Published on: January 9, 2016

15.4K
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

8.7K

科学领域:

  • 行为经济学是一种行为经济学.
  • 决策科学 决策科学 决策科学
  • 心理学 心理学 心理学

背景情况:

  • 稀缺性往往导致当前偏见的选择,通常归因于近视或冲动性决策.
  • 现有的理论可能忽略了影响稀缺性如何影响时间间选择的关键上下文因素.

研究的目的:

  • 研究受威胁需求的时间地平线在缓解稀缺对时间间选择的影响中的作用.
  • 挑战缺乏的纯粹近视/冲动决策账户.

主要方法:

  • 对费城联邦储备银行数据的分析 (研究1).
  • 五项预先注册的研究 (N=10,297) 涉及稀缺感知操纵,时间间的选择任务,以及不同时间的需求.
  • 控制的实验操纵稀缺性,时间地平线,和需要的重要性.

主要成果:

  • 受到威胁的需求的时间地平线显著缓解了在稀缺的情况下的时间间决策.
  • 对于更快的结果的偏好随着需求的更短的时间视界而增加,而随着更长的时间视界而逆转.
  • 在稀缺条件下的决策反映了对需求的重要性和时间近距离的考虑.

结论:

  • 在稀缺的情况下,时间间的选择不仅仅是由近视驱动的,而且受到威胁需求的时间框架的影响.
  • 面临稀缺的人在环境下做出适当的决定,考虑到他们的需求的紧迫性和重要性.
  • 了解需求的时间视界对于设计有效的干预措施来改变稀缺条件下的行为至关重要.