相关实验视频

Updated: Jul 16, 2025

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

在耳鼻喉科 - 头部手术中,ChatGPT-4对手稿的校对准确吗?

Jerome R Lechien^1,2,3,4, Amy Gorton⁵, Jean Robertson⁵

¹Department of Otolaryngology-Head Neck Surgery, Division of Laryngology and Broncho-esophagology, EpiCURA Hospital, UMONS Research Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, University of Mons (UMons), Mons, Belgium.

Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery

|September 17, 2023

概括

聊天GPT-4显示了编辑耳鼻喉学手稿的潜力,检测到超过50%的错误. 然而,非英语母语的研究人员必须了解其在校对学术写作的当前局限性.

科学领域:

耳鼻喉科耳鼻喉科耳鼻喉科
人工智能的人工智能
自然语言处理自然语言处理.

背景情况:

人工智能 (AI) 语言模型,如ChatGPT-4,为医疗专业人员提供了潜在的工具.
耳鼻喉科医生,特别是非母语英语的人,在手稿准备和编辑方面面临着挑战.

研究的目的:

评估ChatGPT-4在检测和纠正耳鼻喉学手稿错误方面的有效性.
评估ChatGPT-4编辑能力对科学文章的准确性和局限性.

主要方法:

分析了四份由非英语母语人士撰写的耳鼻喉学手稿.
使用ChatGPT-4来识别和纠正手稿中的错误.
通过检测和纠正的错误的数量和类型来量化ChatGPT-4的性能.

主要成果:

聊天GPT-4在171个 (50.3%) 错误中检测到86个,包括词汇,决定词,前置词,大写和数字等问题.
人工智能模型建议对83.7%的错误进行适当的纠正.
某些类型的错误,如大写 (5%) 和词汇 (44.4%),被ChatGPT-4识别得很差,它在82个实例中不准确地建议改变.

结论:

聊天GPT-4在识别耳鼻喉学手稿中的特定类型错误方面具有实用性.
目前ChatGPT-4的局限性要求非英语母语研究人员谨慎使用它进行手稿校对.
需要进一步开发以提高AI语言模型在科学编辑中的准确性和可靠性.

关键词:

聊天GPT-4-4 的时间.在 GPT-4 中使用.人工人造的人工人造的人工人造纠正的纠正纠正的纠正头部部部部情报情报情报的情报情报的情报.耳鼻喉科耳鼻喉科耳鼻喉科校对阅读校对阅读校对阅读科学的科学科学的科学科学手术手术手术手术手术手术手术写作写作写作写作

更多相关视频

Robot-Assisted Transcanal Endoscopic Ear Surgery for Congenital Cholesteatoma

Robot-Assisted Transcanal Endoscopic Ear Surgery for Congenital Cholesteatoma

Published on: December 15, 2023

Ultrasound Images of the Tongue: A Tutorial for Assessment and Remediation of Speech Sound Errors

Ultrasound Images of the Tongue: A Tutorial for Assessment and Remediation of Speech Sound Errors

Published on: January 3, 2017

相关概念视频

Proofreading

Proofreading

Improving Translational Accuracy

Improving Translational Accuracy

Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...