青少年驾驶员事故责任率和预测因素
Elizabeth E O'Neal1, Linder Wendt2, Cara Hamann3
1Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States.
Journal of safety research
|September 17, 2023
概括
十几岁的司机,特别是农村地区的男性和年轻青少年,更常常是事故的原因. 渐进的驾驶执照 (GDL) 阶段和先前的传票会影响有罪,单一的违规行为可能会提供保护.
科学领域:
- 道路安全研究 道路安全研究
- 交通事故分析分析
- 青少年驾驶行为 青少年驾驶行为
背景情况:
- 摩托车事故是青少年司机面临的最高风险.
- 导致青少年驾驶员发生车祸的因素尚不完全理解.
- 这项研究调查了毕业驾驶执照 (GDL) 的限制,性别,年龄,道路状况和引用历史,与青少年撞车责任相关.
研究的目的:
- 检查GDL限制对青少年驾驶员事故责任感的贡献.
- 确定与青少年驾驶员事故责任相关的人口和情境因素.
- 分析先前引证历史在青少年驾驶员事故责任感中的作用.
主要方法:
- 对与爱荷华州 (2016-2019) 交通引用记录相关的崩系统数据的分析.
- 包括19,847起事故,涉及14至17岁的青少年驾驶员.
- 多变量后勤回归用于识别基于驾驶员贡献情况和引用历史的撞车责任预测因素.
主要成果:
- 十几岁的司机在68.54%的分析事故中是有罪的.
- 在男性,年轻青少年,农村地区以及在夜间驾驶时间受到限制期间观察到更高的有罪率.
- GDL阶段和引用史 (移动和非移动) 是有罪的重要预测因素.
结论:
- 性,撞车地点和GDL阶段与青少年驾驶员撞车责任感有很大关系.
- 一个单一的移动或非移动违规行为的历史可能会对碰撞责任产生保护作用.
- 对特定的GDL组件和违规类型的进一步研究是有必要的,以提高青少年驾驶员的安全性.
相关概念视频
Fundamental Attribution Error
12.9K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
12.9K
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping
39.1K
People can go to great lengths to protect their self-image and present themselves in ways that they want others to see them. Sociologist Erving Goffman presented the idea that a person is like an actor on a stage. Calling his theory dramaturgy, Goffman believed that we use “impression management” to present ourselves to others as we hope to be perceived. Each situation is a new scene, and individuals perform different roles depending on who is present (Goffman, 1959). Think about...
39.1K
Hypothesis Test for Test of Independence
3.6K
The test of independence is a chi-square-based test used to determine whether two variables or factors are independent or dependent. This hypothesis test is used to examine the independence of the variables. One can construct two qualitative survey questions or experiments based on the variables in a contingency table. The goal is to see if the two variables are unrelated (independent) or related (dependent). The null and alternative hypotheses for this test are:
H0: The two variables (factors)...
H0: The two variables (factors)...
3.6K
Attribution Theory
13.0K
Behavior is a product of both the situation (e.g., cultural influences, social roles, and the presence of bystanders) and of the person (e.g., personality characteristics). Subfields of psychology tend to focus on one influence or behavior over others. Situationism is the view that our behavior and actions are determined by our immediate environment and surroundings. In contrast, dispositionism holds that our behavior is determined by internal factors (Heider, 1958).
13.0K
Determination of Expected Frequency
2.2K
Suppose one wants to test independence between the two variables of a contingency table. The values in the table constitute the observed frequencies of the dataset. But how does one determine the expected frequency of the dataset? One of the important assumptions is that the two variables are independent, which means the variables do not influence each other. For independent variables, the statistical probability of any event involving both variables is calculated by multiplying the individual...
2.2K
Introduction to Test of Independence
2.3K
In statistics, the term independence means that one can directly obtain the probability of any event involving both variables by multiplying their individual probabilities. Tests of independence are chi-square tests involving the use of a contingency table of observed (data) values.
The test statistic for a test of independence is similar to that of a goodness-of-fit test:
The test statistic for a test of independence is similar to that of a goodness-of-fit test:
2.3K


