Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Metacognition01:26

Metacognition

193
Metacognition is a conscious process where individuals are aware of their cognitive and executive processes, such as planning before solving a problem or self-monitoring during reading. For instance, a writer may need help with composing a piece. The situation involves a writer who is working on a piece of writing, but while doing so, they realize that something is missing. They notice that their characters lack depth or details. This realization occurs because the writer is reflecting on their...
193
Patient-centered Care01:13

Patient-centered Care

2.1K
Patient-centered care involves delivering care beyond inpatient hospitalization. Reflective practice can enhance a patient-centered approach. Reflective practice is a process of reasoning that considers all aspects of the present situation, including practicalities, learning from personal practice, and consideration of patient needs. Patients appreciate care decisions made while considering their input. Involving the patient in their care provides the patient with a sense of contribution rather...
2.1K
Critical Thinking II01:25

Critical Thinking II

2.9K
Critical thinking is a cognitive process with several attributes. The attributes of critical thinking include the following:
2.9K
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

59.5K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
59.5K
Obedience01:08

Obedience

32.9K
According to obedience research, we may harm others under the forceful pressures of an authority figure (Milgram, 1974). How about if the inappropriate orders were delivered with less force? The increasing interdependence between nurses and physicians compelled Hofling and his colleagues to explore nurses’ reactions to a potentially harmful medical request made by the perceived authority figure, the doctor (Hofling, Brotzman, Dalrymple, Graves, & Pierce, 1966). In this situation,...
32.9K
Nursing Assessment01:29

Nursing Assessment

7.7K
The two sources for collecting information are primary and secondary. After gathering information, interpretation and validation help to complete the data. The purpose of assessment is to establish data with the initial information, to interpret data about the patient's perceived needs and health problems, and to respond to these problems identified.
The nurse collects all aspects of the patient's health in the initial assessment, establishing priorities for ongoing focused assessments...
7.7K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Patients' Voices and the Assessment of Medical Trainees: A Discourse Analysis.

Perspectives on medical education·2026
Same author

Let's talk about change as the only constant in life and science: <i>parlons de changements</i>.

Canadian medical education journal·2026
Same author

Reprioritising consultation in scoping reviews: Clarifying purposes and practices.

Medical education·2026
Same author

Fulfilling a social mission: examining practice locations of residency graduates over two decades.

Canadian medical education journal·2025
Same author

Documenting medical students' use of self-explanations: tool development and initial validity evidence.

Canadian medical education journal·2025
Same author

Living With the Gift of Giftedness: An Exploratory Study on the Well-Being of Intellectually Gifted Adults.

The gifted child quarterly·2025

相关实验视频

Updated: Jul 16, 2025

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education
10:07

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education

Published on: June 21, 2010

19.0K

评估对反思的承诺:医学学生的看法.

Joanie Poirier1, Kathleen Ouellet2, Valérie Désilets3

  • 1Department of psychology, Faculty of letters and human sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.

Canadian medical education journal
|September 18, 2023
PubMed
概括

评估医学学生对专业身份的反思提高了他们的动力,但也引起了人们对真实性和主观性的担忧. 导师关系影响了人们的看法,这表明了评估反思能力的有希望但微妙的方法.

更多相关视频

Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity
07:32

Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity

Published on: February 10, 2016

9.4K
Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
12:55

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

Published on: September 27, 2020

8.5K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jul 16, 2025

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education
10:07

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education

Published on: June 21, 2010

19.0K
Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity
07:32

Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity

Published on: February 10, 2016

9.4K
Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
12:55

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties

Published on: September 27, 2020

8.5K

科学领域:

  • 医学教育 医学教育
  • 专业身份发展 专业身份发展
  • 反射性实践评估反射性的实践评估

背景情况:

  • 发展反思能力对于医疗专业人员至关重要.
  • 评估这些技能可能会导致意想不到的负面后果.
  • 这项研究检查了学生在纵向课程中对反射评估的看法.

研究的目的:

  • 探索医学学生对评估的看法,专注于反思和专业身份.
  • 了解评估对学生对反思的承诺的影响.
  • 在反思评估的背景下,评估学生导师关系.

主要方法:

  • 定性描述性研究设计.
  • 与27名医学学生 (21名第一年,6名第二年) 进行了半结构面试.
  • 采用了主题分析,以布劳恩和克拉克的六步方法为指导.

主要成果:

  • 出现了四个主要主题:评估作为激励因素,对真实性的影响,感知主观性和导师关系.
  • 在评估反思过程时,学生报告了高的动力.
  • 关于真实性的矛盾和对评估主观性的担忧被注意到.

结论:

  • 评估医学学生的反思过程产生了很高的动机,但对真实性的感觉是不同的.
  • 评估的主观性和学生导师关系是重要的因素.
  • 这种评估方法有望评估反思能力,同时减轻负面后果.