哪个更重要,提议者的身份还是分配动机? 经济决策中的事件相关潜力
Ran-Ran Zhang1,2, Yu-Qing Meng1, Yan Tian1
1School of Medical Humanities, Guizhou Medical University, Guizhou, 550004, People's Republic of China.
Psychology research and behavior management
|September 19, 2023
概括
这项研究探讨了"最后通游戏"中的"黑羊效应",发现在特定条件下,个人对群体内部成员的惩罚比对外成员更为严厉. 这挑战了典型的群体内偏见,为社会决策提供了新的见解.
科学领域:
- 社会心理学 社会心理学
- 神经科学是一个神经科学.
- 行为经济学是一种行为经济学.
背景情况:
- 传统的最后通游戏研究表明,群体内偏好和群体外歧视.
- 这是一个很棒的节目,这是一个很棒的节目.
- 黑羊效应是一个黑羊效应.
- 建议集团内部成员可能面临比集团外成员更严厉的判断.
- 了解这些社会判断背后的心理机制至关重要.
研究的目的:
- 为了调查该事件的发生.
- 黑羊效应是一个黑羊效应.
- 在最后通游戏中.
- 检查提议者身份 (集团内与集团外) 和分配动机 (自私与随机) 对报价拒绝的影响.
- 使用事件相关潜力 (ERP) 技术,探索这些社会决策过程的神经相关性.
主要方法:
- 一个混合实验设计,使用89名健康的大学生.
- 参与者用不同的提议者身份和分配动机进行了最后通游戏.
- 与事件相关的潜在 (ERP) 数据,包括与反相关的负面性 (FRN) 和P300,在任务执行期间记录.
主要成果:
- 在行为上,
- 黑羊效应是一个黑羊效应.
- 对于具有随机分配动机的公平报价而言,观察到的是.
- ERP结果表明,提议者身份调节了FRN和P300,但分配动机没有独立地.
- 分配动机和提案者身份之间的相互作用影响了FRN和P300,特别是在公平的报价方面.
结论:
- 这是一个很棒的节目,这是一个很棒的节目.
- 黑羊效应是一个黑羊效应.
- 与被认为是外组成员的劣势或痛苦有关,并根据分配动机进行调整.
- 在P300组件表明,外组成员 (例如,抑郁的学生) 吸引更多的注意力,因为违反了预期.
- 这些发现提高了对神经和心理机制的理解,这些机制是对神经和心理反应的基础.
- 黑羊效应是一个黑羊效应.
- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 这是一个很好的时刻.
更多相关视频
08:24The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
742
13:04Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
Published on: September 19, 2012
12.1K
相关概念视频
Framing Effects
7.4K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
7.4K
Egoism and Altruism
92.0K
Voluntary behavior with the intent to help other people is called prosocial behavior. Why do people help other people? Is personal benefit such as feeling good about oneself the only reason people help one another?
92.0K
Fundamental Attribution Error
12.9K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
12.9K
Decision Making: P-value Method
5.5K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
5.5K
Attribution Theory
13.0K
Behavior is a product of both the situation (e.g., cultural influences, social roles, and the presence of bystanders) and of the person (e.g., personality characteristics). Subfields of psychology tend to focus on one influence or behavior over others. Situationism is the view that our behavior and actions are determined by our immediate environment and surroundings. In contrast, dispositionism holds that our behavior is determined by internal factors (Heider, 1958).
13.0K
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
7.3K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.3K
