机器学习模型的通用性,以改善在多个临床中心对甲状腺激素相关测试的利用
He S Yang1, Weishen Pan2, Yingheng Wang3
1Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
Clinical chemistry
|September 22, 2023
概括
机器学习 (ML) 可以改善副甲状腺激素相关 (PTHrP) 测试的使用. 直接将ML模型应用于新数据可能会失败,但重新训练或重建模型可以提高准确性,以便做出更好的临床决策.
科学领域:
- 在瘤学瘤学.
- 生物化学 生化学
- 医疗信息学 医疗信息学
背景情况:
- 甲状腺激素相关 (PTHrP) 测试有助于诊断恶性瘤的幽默性高热血症.
- 当前的PTHrP订单实践往往缺乏预测概率,导致测试利用效率低下.
- 手动审查PTHrP结果以识别不合适的订单是耗时的.
研究的目的:
- 开发和评估用于预测异常PTHrP结果的机器学习 (ML) 模型.
- 评估改善ML模型在不同数据集中的通用性的策略.
- 通过自动化结果审查,提高PTHrP测试的临床效用.
主要方法:
- 开发了一个ML模型,使用1330名患者的数据集来预测异常PTHrP结果.
- 在两个外部数据集上评估模型性能,采用模型传输,再培训,重建和微调等策略.
- 利用最大平均差异 (MMD) 来量化数据集之间的数据分布转移.
主要成果:
- 最初的ML模型在开发队列中实现了0.936的AUROC.
- 将模型直接传输到外部数据集下降了AUROC到0.838和0.737.
- 用特定站点数据重建模型将AUROC提高到0.891和0.837;微调也提高了有限的外部数据的实用性.
结论:
- 机器学习有可能优化PTHrP测试利用率并减少手动审查负担.
- 直接在不同机构中应用ML模型可能会导致由于数据转移而导致性能下降.
- 如果有足够的数据,模型重新训练或重建是有效的,而微调对于有限的特定站点数据是有益的.
相关概念视频
Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion
96
Physiological and compartmental models are valuable tools used in studying biological systems. These models rely on differential equations to maintain mass balance within the system, ensuring an accurate representation of the dynamic processes at play.
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.
96
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
481
In healthcare diagnostics, laboratory tests play a crucial role in identifying and diagnosing a wide range of medical conditions. However, interpreting test results is not always straightforward. An abnormal test result does not always confirm the presence of a disease, just as a normal result does not guarantee its absence. To assess the reliability of these diagnostic tools, healthcare practitioners rely on two key statistical indicators: sensitivity and specificity.
Sensitivity is the...
Sensitivity is the...
481


