在学术医学领导层的种族,民族和性别多样性
Austin M Meadows1,2, Madelyn M Skinner1, Alaa A Hazime1
1Henry Ford Health, Detroit, Michigan.
JAMA network open
|September 25, 2023
概括
学术医学领导层的多样性显示出混合的进步. 虽然一些专业增加了代表性,但外科领域落后,凸显了有针对性的多样性倡议的需要.
科学领域:
- 医学教育 医学教育
- 医疗卫生工作人员多样性 多样性
- 学术医学 学术医学
背景情况:
- 在医学专业中,仍然存在显著的性别和种族多样性差距.
- 多元化的医生劳动力提供了许多好处.
- 通过多样化的领导力实现自上而下的多样化是提议的一项战略,旨在提高劳动力代表性.
研究的目的:
- 分析2007年至2019年间学术医学领导层多样性的变化.
- 为了比较最近跨专业的领导力多样性与整体平均值.
主要方法:
- 2007年,2019年和2020年在学术角色 (教师,项目主任,主席) 的医生的横截面分析.
- 从美国医学院协会收集的人口统计数据.
- 包括初级保健 (内科,家庭医学,儿科,妇科) 和外科专业 (骨科,神经,耳鼻喉,整体外科).
主要成果:
- 从2007年到2019年,只有内部医学和整形外科的少数民族主席代表数量大幅增加.
- 一些专业,包括家庭医学,儿科,妇产科医生,骨科外科和整体外科,显示女性领导力显著增加.
- 与初级保健专业相比,外科专业通常表现出较低的领导层多样性.
结论:
- 弥合多样性差距的进展在医学专业之间有很大差异.
- 建议包括对多样性努力的透明报告,多样化的领导层选择委员会,以及在招聘中积极促进多样性.
相关概念视频
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
90.2K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
90.2K
Relationship Formation
40.1K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
40.1K
Barriers to Effective Communication II
3.7K
The barriers to effective communication also include cultural barriers, semantic barriers, gender barriers, and time constraints.
Cultural barriers:
Differences in values, beliefs, religion, knowledge, and tradition can significantly impact communication. Awareness of nonverbal cues is critical, especially when conversing with a patient from a different culture. What appears appropriate in one culture may be inappropriate in another.
Semantic barriers:
As a result of their tendency to use...
Cultural barriers:
Differences in values, beliefs, religion, knowledge, and tradition can significantly impact communication. Awareness of nonverbal cues is critical, especially when conversing with a patient from a different culture. What appears appropriate in one culture may be inappropriate in another.
Semantic barriers:
As a result of their tendency to use...
3.7K
Obedience
32.9K
According to obedience research, we may harm others under the forceful pressures of an authority figure (Milgram, 1974). How about if the inappropriate orders were delivered with less force? The increasing interdependence between nurses and physicians compelled Hofling and his colleagues to explore nurses’ reactions to a potentially harmful medical request made by the perceived authority figure, the doctor (Hofling, Brotzman, Dalrymple, Graves, & Pierce, 1966). In this situation,...
32.9K
Ethnic Identity within a Larger Culture
48
Adolescents from ethnic minority backgrounds face a multifaceted journey in forming their identities, shaped by the intersections of cultural expectations and personal exploration. For these adolescents, identity formation involves not only typical developmental challenges but also navigating the perceptions and attitudes of the majority culture. As they grow, adolescents in ethnic minority groups often become increasingly aware of stereotypes, social biases, and discrimination, all of which...
48
Ethical Dilemmas II
1.1K
Resolving an ethical dilemma in healthcare involves a systematic approach that considers every aspect of the issue, respecting both the patient's needs and values and the healthcare professional's ethical obligations. Here are potential steps to resolve an ethical dilemma:
1.1K


