酒精,性兴奋和伴侣熟悉度作为避孕套谈判的预测因素:一个经验抽样研究
Peter Luehring-Jones1, Daniel Fulford2, Tibor P Palfai3
1Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA. pluehrin@bu.edu.
AIDS and behavior
|September 26, 2023
概括
对于与男性发生性关系的男性 (MSM),酒精,性兴奋和伴侣的熟悉性并没有影响日常生活中的避孕套谈判. 然而,伴侣的熟悉程度和性兴奋程度影响了个人之间的谈判发生率和难度.
科学领域:
- 行为科学 行为科学
- 公共卫生 公共卫生
- 心理学 心理学 心理学
背景情况:
- 与男性发生性关系的男性 (MSM) 的风险性决策受各种因素的影响.
- 实验室研究表明,酒精,性兴奋和伴侣的熟悉程度会影响避孕套谈判.
- 关于这些因素在MSM日常生活的现实世界背景下存在有限的研究.
研究的目的:
- 调查酒精消费,性兴奋和伴侣熟悉对MSM之间的避孕套谈判过程的影响.
- 将关于性决策的实验室发现扩展到MSM的日常经历中.
主要方法:
- 收集了257名中度和重度饮酒的MSM每日数据,持续6周.
- 检查了酒精消费对主体内部和主体之间的影响,平均每日性兴奋度,以及对避孕套谈判的合作伙伴熟悉度.
- 评估了性接触期间谈判的发生率和困难.
主要成果:
- 对于酒精消费,性兴奋或伴侣熟悉程度,在避孕套谈判结果上没有发现显著的对象内影响.
- 伴侣的熟悉程度和平均每日性兴奋程度对谈判的可能性产生了显著的影响.
- 伴侣的熟悉程度和平均每日性兴奋也显著影响了避孕套谈判的难度.
结论:
- 伴侣熟悉度和性兴奋的个体差异,而不是每天的波动,影响MSM的避孕套谈判动态.
- 调查结果突出了实验室和现实世界关于性风险行为的研究之间的差异.
- 结果对制定针对MSM的有针对性的降低风险策略有影响.
相关概念视频
Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective
119
In a study where individuals posing as strangers offered compliments and proposed casual sex to students, the responses differed significantly based on gender. Not a single woman accepted the proposal, while 70% of the men agreed. This outcome provides a useful scenario to explore through the lens of evolutionary psychology and social learning theory, highlighting the diverse perspectives on human sexual behaviors.
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...
119
Relationship Formation
40.1K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
40.1K
Persuasion Strategies
38.7K
Researchers have tested many persuasion strategies, including the foot-in-the door and the door-in-the-face techniques, in a variety of contexts. Ultimately, the principles are effective in selling products and changing people’s attitude, ideas, and behaviors (Cialdini & Goldstein, 2004).
38.7K
Deindividuation
26.4K
Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.
26.4K
Social Proof
27.7K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.7K
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping
39.1K
People can go to great lengths to protect their self-image and present themselves in ways that they want others to see them. Sociologist Erving Goffman presented the idea that a person is like an actor on a stage. Calling his theory dramaturgy, Goffman believed that we use “impression management” to present ourselves to others as we hope to be perceived. Each situation is a new scene, and individuals perform different roles depending on who is present (Goffman, 1959). Think about...
39.1K


