参与式研究是如何工作的:为现实主义合成的协议.
Loubna Belaid1,2, Ivàn Sarmiento2,3, Anna Dion4
1Direction de la recherche et de l'enseignement, École Nationale d'Administration Publique (ÉNAP), Quebec, Quebec, Canada loubna.belaid@enap.ca.
BMJ open
|September 29, 2023
概括
这篇现实主义的评论探讨了参与式研究伙伴关系如何影响健康和社会结果. 它旨在澄清驱动这些影响的机制和背景,以便更好地设计卫生干预措施.
科学领域:
- 公共卫生和卫生服务研究研究
- 基于社区的参与式研究
- 卫生干预设计和评估
背景情况:
- 参与式研究强调在研究,治理和所有权方面的伙伴关系,在卫生干预设计中获得了吸引力.
- 尽管使用量增加,参与式研究仍然缺乏理论,改善健康结果的机制尚不清楚.
- 了解其影响的"如何"和"在什么情况下"对于有效的健康战略至关重要.
研究的目的:
- 进行现实的审查,以了解参与式研究对健康和社会结果的影响.
- 确定参与式研究影响结果的机制.
- 探索调节参与式研究与其结果之间的关系的上下文因素.
主要方法:
- 按照RAMESES II的指导方针进行现实的评估.
- 系统搜索,质量评估,数据提取和综合使用上下文-机制-结果配置.
- 复原性分析结合经验数据和理论来识别机制并解释结果-上下文匹配.
主要成果:
- 该审查将综合证据,以产生关于参与式研究有效性的中等范围理论.
- 确定具体的机制和背景因素,解释参与式研究如何以及为谁工作.
- 发展对参与式研究带来希望的健康和社会结果的条件的细微理解.
结论:
- 这一综述将为参与式健康研究的运作提供理论见解.
- 调查结果将为设计和实施更有效,更符合环境的健康干预措施提供信息.
- 这项研究旨在阐明参与式方法有助于改善健康和社会公平的复杂途径.
更多相关视频
相关概念视频
Ethics in Research
23.0K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
23.0K
Naturalistic Observations
15.5K
If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
15.5K
Archival Research
16.0K
Some researchers gain access to large amounts of data without interacting with a single research participant. Instead, they use existing records to answer various research questions. This type of research approach is known as archival research. Archival research relies on looking at past records or data sets to look for interesting patterns or relationships. For example, a researcher might access the academic records of all individuals who enrolled in college within the past ten years and...
16.0K
Stratified Sampling Method
12.1K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
To choose a stratified sample, divide the population into groups called strata and then take a...
To choose a stratified sample, divide the population into groups called strata and then take a...
12.1K
Observational Studies
8.7K
Observational studies are a type of analytical study where researchers observe events without any interventions. In other words, the researcher does not influence the response variable or the experiment's outcome.
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One...
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One...
8.7K
Longitudinal Research
12.0K
Sometimes we want to see how people change over time, as in studies of human development and lifespan. When we test the same group of individuals repeatedly over an extended period of time, we are conducting longitudinal research. Longitudinal research is a research design in which data-gathering is administered repeatedly over an extended period of time. For example, we may survey a group of individuals about their dietary habits at age 20, retest them a decade later at age 30, and then again...
12.0K


