系统评论中证据评估的确定性 发表于高影响力的体育科学期刊:一项超流行病学研究
Madelin R Siedler1,2, Katie N Harris2, Christian Rodriguez2
1Evidence Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)
|September 30, 2023
概括
只有20%的体育科学系统审查评估证据的确定性. 需要增加对推评估,开发和评估 (GRADE) 等方法的教育,以提高审查质量和影响.
科学领域:
- 运动科学 运动科学 运动科学
- 运动科学 运动科学
- 系统审查是系统的审查.
背景情况:
- 评估证据的确定性对于系统审查至关重要.
- 本研究探讨了体育科学评论中如何评估证据的确定性.
研究的目的:
- 确定高影响力的体育科学期刊中证据评估的频率和确定性方法.
- 在六年时间内分析证据确定性评估的趋势.
主要方法:
- 在PubMed和期刊网站上搜索了前十大影响力体育科学期刊 (2016-2022) 的系统评论.
- 独立审查员使用预先定义的标准对符合条件的文件进行了选.
- 分析了1250个符合条件的系统审查.
主要成果:
- 20.6%的审查评估了证据的确定性,使用至少两个领域.
- 最常见的方法是推评估,开发和评估 (GRADE) 的分级方法 (61.6%).
- 偏见风险,不准确性和不一致性是常见的评估领域,而间接性/适用性则不那么频繁.
结论:
- 目前,体育科学系统审查中的很少一部分评估证据的确定性.
- 建议加强关于证据评估方法的教育,以提高审查质量和临床影响.
相关概念视频
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Introduction to Epidemiology
Epidemiology, known as the cornerstone of public health, involves studying the distribution and determinants of health-related events in defined populations and applying these insights to control health issues. This is essential for understanding how diseases spread, identifying populations at greater risk, and implementing measures to control or prevent outbreaks. Epidemiology addresses not only infectious diseases but also non-communicable conditions like cancer and cardiovascular disease,...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:


