反运动跳跃力-时间曲线分析:跨力板系统的可靠性和可比性
Justin J Merrigan1,2, Adam Strang1, Jason Eckerle1
1STRONG Lab, Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base (WPAFB), Ohio.
Journal of strength and conditioning research
|October 10, 2023
概括
商业强力板系统在反运动跳跃 (CMJ) 分析中显示出不一致. 人类表现从业者必须了解这些差异,以避免在各种力板平台上比较数据时出现错误.
科学领域:
- 生物力学和人类运动分析
- 体育科学和绩效测试 运动科学和绩效测试
- 测量科学和仪器仪表技术
背景情况:
- 越来越多的商业力量板用于自动化力-时间分析,需要了解它们的系统间协议.
- 以前的研究还没有全面比较不同力板系统的反运动跳跃 (CMJ) 度量的可靠性和可比性.
- 跨平台的度量定义和单位的变化可能会影响数据的解释和应用在人类表现.
研究的目的:
- 为了比较三种流行的力板系统的反运动跳跃 (CMJ) 度量:Vald ForceDecks (FD),霍金动力学 (HD) 和斯巴达科学 (SS).
- 评估CMJ关键性能指标的可靠性和可比性,包括跳跃高度,力量发展速度 (RFD) 和反应强度指数 (RSI),在这些系统中.
- 在使用不同强力板技术时,向人类表现从业者告知潜在的差异和偏见.
主要方法:
- 22名受试者在FD,HD和SS强力板系统上进行了反运动跳跃 (CMJ),并进行了多次试验和休息时间.
- 基线测试进行了三次,以评估修改反应强度指数 (mRSI) 和RFD的测试-重新测试可靠性.
- 使用一致性相关系数 (CCC) 和偏差分析来量化一致性,并确定系统之间的系统性或比例差异.
主要成果:
- 在所有系统中观察到mRSI和RFD的测试-重新测试可靠性较差.
- 在一些指标 (例如跳跃高度,相对力,冲动) 上,FD和HD显示出可接受的一致性,但RFD显示出系统和比例的偏差.
- 与FD和HD相比,Sparta Science (SS) 倾向于高估跳跃高度和RSI,尽管跳跃高度协议是可以接受的 (CCC = 0.92-0.95). SS负载 (异常RFD) 与高频制动RFD (CCC = 0.91) 和FD减速RFD (CCC = 0.81-0.87) 显示了可接受的一致性,但有偏差. SS爆发 (集中力) 与FD和HD有可接受的协议,但系统地较低的值.
结论:
- 在反运动跳跃 (CMJ) 度量计算和在不同的力板系统 (FD,HD,SS) 中报告方面存在重大不一致.
- 实践人员在比较来自不同平台的CMJ数据时,必须意识到系统偏见和衡量定义 (例如,测量单位) 的差异.
- 仔细考虑这些系统间的变化对于准确解释和应用训练和运动员监测中的性能数据至关重要.
相关概念视频
Two-Dimensional Force System
921
A two-dimensional system in mechanical engineering involves the analysis of motion and forces in a plane. A two-dimensional force vector can be resolved into its components as:
921
Three-Dimensional Force System
2.0K
In mechanical engineering, a three-dimensional force system is a system of forces acting in three dimensions, with forces applied along the x, y, and z coordinate axes. The three-dimensional force system is an important concept in mechanical engineering, as it allows engineers to understand and analyze the behavior of objects and structures in three dimensions. By understanding the forces acting on a system, engineers can design more efficient and effective mechanical systems that can withstand...
2.0K
Static and Kinetic Frictional Force
16.0K
One of the simpler characteristics of sliding friction is that it is parallel to the contact surfaces between systems, and is always in a direction that opposes the motion or attempted motion of the systems relative to each other. If two systems are in contact and moving relative to one another, then the friction between them is called kinetic friction. For example, kinetic friction slows a hockey puck sliding on ice.
However, if two systems are in contact and are stationary relative to one...
However, if two systems are in contact and are stationary relative to one...
16.0K
Relative Motion Analysis - Acceleration
363
A slider-crank mechanism converts rotational motion from the crank into linear motion of the slider or vice versa. This mechanism consists of three main parts: the crank, the connecting rod, and the slider. The movement of the slider-crank is an example of general plane motion as the fluctuating angle between the crank and the connecting rod. Consider a segment AB where point A is at the end of the slider and point B is on the diametrically opposite end to point A, on a crack. The variance in...
363
Power Expended by a Constant Force
7.6K
The relationship between work done and the time taken to do it can be explained using the concept of power. For example, several sprinters in a race may have the same velocity when they reach the finish line, therefore doing the same amount of work, but the winner does it in the least amount of time. Thus, power is defined as the rate of doing work. Since work can vary as a function of time, the average power is defined as the work done during a time interval, divided by the time interval.
7.6K


