选择合作伙伴和在社会困境中合作可以增加资源不平等
Mirre Stallen1,2, Luuk L Snijder3, Jörg Gross4
1Social, Economic and Organisational Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Nature communications
|October 13, 2023
概括
在社会困境中选择伴侣可能会加剧不平等. 当个人选择合作伙伴时,那些资源和生产力高的合作伙伴专门配对,增加差距,让其他人处于不太有利的合作伙伴关系中.
科学领域:
- 行为经济学是一种行为经济学.
- 社会困境 社会困境
- 游戏理论 游戏理论
背景情况:
- 合作往往通过选择合作伙伴来促进.
- 然而,在不平等的社会中,伴侣选择可能会加剧资源差异.
- 本研究研究了在资源不平等的环境中选择合作伙伴的影响.
研究的目的:
- 实验性地研究合作伙伴选择如何影响合作和资源不平等.
- 为了测试伴侣选择在不平等的社会中是有害的猜测.
主要方法:
- 一个重复的公共产品游戏实验,共有336名参与者.
- 参与者被分配高/低资产和高/低生产率因子.
- 两个条件:分配的合作伙伴与基于偏好的自我选择的合作伙伴.
主要成果:
- 在伴侣选择下,高资产,高生产力个体被专属配对.
- 这种自我选择加剧了先前存在的资源差异.
- 资源较少的个人被降级到更不富有成效的伙伴关系中.
结论:
- 在社会困境中选择合作伙伴可以放大资源不平等.
- 在不平等的社会中允许选择伴侣可能会导致更大的分层.
- 调查结果强调了选择,合作和经济差异之间的复杂相互作用.
相关概念视频
Relationship Formation
40.0K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
40.0K
Social Exchange Theory
34.5K
We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
34.5K
Social Proof
27.7K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.7K
In- and Out-Groups
39.1K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
39.1K
Robbers Cave
14.3K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.3K
Social Traps
22.3K
Social traps are negative situations where people get caught in a direction or relationship that later proves to be unpleasant, with no easy way to back out of or avoid. The concept was orignally introduced by John Platt who applied psychology to Garrett Hardin's "Tragedy of the Commons", where in New England herd owners could let their cattle graze in the common ground. This situation seems like a good idea, but an individual could have an advantage. If they owned...
22.3K


