不公正经验问卷在希腊的跨文化适应和验证
Paraskevi Bilika1, George Vidakis1, Myron Loukadakis1
1Clinical Exercise Physiology and Rehabilitation Research Laboratory, Department of Physiotherapy, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, Lamia, Greece.
Disability and rehabilitation
|October 16, 2023
概括
希腊版本的不公正经验问卷 (IEQ-GR) 在评估慢性疼痛患者的不公正感知方面表现出卓越的可靠性和有效性. 这种经过验证的工具有助于了解希腊慢性疼痛对心理的影响.
科学领域:
- 心理学 心理学 心理学
- 疼痛管理 疼痛管理
- 健康科学 卫生科学 卫生科学
背景情况:
- 慢性疼痛显著影响个人的生活质量.
- 与疼痛相关的不公正感知是一个公认的心理因素.
- 不公正经验问卷 (IEQ) 衡量这些不公正感知.
研究的目的:
- 进行IEQ的希腊语 (IEQ-GR) 的跨文化适应.
- 评估IEQ-GR的可行性,可靠性 (绝对和相对) 和有效性 (融合和构造).
- 建立一个文化相关的工具来评估希腊慢性疼痛人口中的不公正.
主要方法:
- 按照既定的指导方针进行IEQ的跨文化适应.
- 对90名慢性疼痛患者和44名健康对照进行了IEQ-GR,疼痛灾难化量表 (PCS) 和医院焦虑和抑郁量表 (HADS).
- 在一周内对36名参与者的子集评估了测试重复测试的可靠性.
主要成果:
- IEQ-GR表现出卓越的可靠性,总得分为0.98的课内相关系数 (ICC),单个项目为0.83-0.96.
- 发现了很高的内部一致性,Cronbach的alpha为0.98的总得分和0.91-0.98的项目.
- 在IEQ-GR和PCS (r=0.59),HADS (r=0.58),HADS-抑郁症 (r=0.50) 和HADS-焦虑症 (r=0.55) 之间观察到显著的正相关性,表明良好的融合有效性.
- 在慢性疼痛患者和对照组之间发现了IEQ得分的统计学上显著差异,支持构造有效性.
结论:
- 希腊版本的不公正经验问卷 (IEQ-GR) 是一个可行的和可靠的工具.
- 在希腊人群中,IEQ-GR表现出极好的内部一致性,收有效性和区分有效性.
- 这种经过验证的工具可以有效地用于评估希腊语说者之间与慢性疼痛相关的不公正感.
更多相关视频
相关概念视频
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
90.2K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
90.2K
Surveys
14.8K
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
14.8K
Deindividuation
26.4K
Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.
26.4K
Stereotype Content Model
14.7K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.7K
The Stanford Prison Experiment
23.2K
The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
23.2K
Social Proof
27.7K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.7K


