Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Data Collection by Observations01:08

Data Collection by Observations

12.1K
Data collection refers to a systematic way of obtaining, observing, measuring, and analyzing accurate information. Observational studies are one of the most widely used methods of data collection. It involves collecting data by observing the behavior and physical characteristics of a sample without making any modifications to the sample.
An astronomer viewing the motion and brightness of stars in the sky and recording the data is an example of observational data collection. A botanist recording...
12.1K
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

23.0K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
23.0K
Naturalistic Observations02:30

Naturalistic Observations

15.5K
If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
15.5K
Conservation of Declining Populations02:07

Conservation of Declining Populations

9.6K
Conservation of declining population focuses on ways of detecting, diagnosing, and halting a population decline. The approach uses methods to prevent populations from going extinct.
9.6K
Deindividuation00:57

Deindividuation

26.4K
Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.
26.4K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Scientific conferences, socialization, and the Covid-19 pandemic: A conceptual and empirical enquiry.

Social studies of science·2023
Same journal

Willingness to participate in medical research: Unraveling the roles of scientific literacy and beliefs about medical researchers.

Public understanding of science (Bristol, England)·2026
Same journal

Does medium matter? Political orientation and variability in scientific self-perceptions.

Public understanding of science (Bristol, England)·2026
Same journal

Public backlash against science communicators: Conceptualization and qualitative analysis of perceptions, effects, responses, and contextual factors.

Public understanding of science (Bristol, England)·2026
Same journal

Experts' boundary work on social media: Doctors on Instagram.

Public understanding of science (Bristol, England)·2026
Same journal

Too sure or not sure enough? Trust may hinge on scientists' uncertainty matching knowledgeable audiences' tolerance for it.

Public understanding of science (Bristol, England)·2026
Same journal

Threatened by science: Can affirmations alleviate motivated science rejection?

Public understanding of science (Bristol, England)·2026
查看所有相关文章

相关实验视频

Updated: Jul 12, 2025

Methodology for Establishing a Community-Wide Life Laboratory for Capturing Unobtrusive and Continuous Remote Activity and Health Data
11:21

Methodology for Establishing a Community-Wide Life Laboratory for Capturing Unobtrusive and Continuous Remote Activity and Health Data

Published on: July 27, 2018

8.2K

黑暗的公民科学科学.

James Riley1, Will Mason-Wilkes1

  • 1University of Birmingham, UK.

Public understanding of science (Bristol, England)
|October 20, 2023
PubMed
概括
此摘要是机器生成的。

公民科学常常受到赞扬,但公民科学却没有受到赞扬.

关键词:
谷歌的 reCAPTCHA 是一个动物世界是动物世界.公民科学是公民科学.众包 (crowdsourcing) 是一种众包方式.劳动劳动劳动劳动劳动劳动劳动劳动.科学机构科学机构.

更多相关视频

Swabbing the Urban Environment - A Pipeline for Sampling and Detection of SARS-CoV-2 From Environmental Reservoirs
07:13

Swabbing the Urban Environment - A Pipeline for Sampling and Detection of SARS-CoV-2 From Environmental Reservoirs

Published on: April 9, 2021

4.3K
Human Circadian Phenotyping and Diurnal Performance Testing in the Real World
10:16

Human Circadian Phenotyping and Diurnal Performance Testing in the Real World

Published on: April 7, 2020

8.5K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jul 12, 2025

Methodology for Establishing a Community-Wide Life Laboratory for Capturing Unobtrusive and Continuous Remote Activity and Health Data
11:21

Methodology for Establishing a Community-Wide Life Laboratory for Capturing Unobtrusive and Continuous Remote Activity and Health Data

Published on: July 27, 2018

8.2K
Swabbing the Urban Environment - A Pipeline for Sampling and Detection of SARS-CoV-2 From Environmental Reservoirs
07:13

Swabbing the Urban Environment - A Pipeline for Sampling and Detection of SARS-CoV-2 From Environmental Reservoirs

Published on: April 9, 2021

4.3K
Human Circadian Phenotyping and Diurnal Performance Testing in the Real World
10:16

Human Circadian Phenotyping and Diurnal Performance Testing in the Real World

Published on: April 7, 2020

8.5K

科学领域:

  • 科学社会学科学社会学
  • 科学与技术研究 研究科学与技术研究
  • 数字人文学科 数字人文学科

背景情况:

  • 公民科学倡议被广泛庆祝为公众参与研究.
  • 然而,一些社会技术科学活动模仿公民科学,但与其核心理念有所不同.
  • 这种分歧需要对科学与公民的合作进行批判性审查.

研究的目的:

  • 引入和定义"黑暗公民科学"的概念.
  • 分析将传统的公民科学与其黑暗的对应区分开来的概念维度.
  • 将一个公认的公民科学项目与一个"黑暗"的公民科学项目进行比较,以说明关键差异.

主要方法:

  • 基于互联网的两个分类任务的比较分析:银河动物园 (公民科学) 和谷歌的reCAPTCHA (黑暗的公民科学).
  • 识别和应用五个概念维度:目的,过程,可感知性,权力和公众影响.
  • 探索社会技术科学劳动及其影响.

主要成果:

  • 黑暗的公民科学与传统的公民科学有着共同的目的和过程,但在感知度,权力和公共效果方面有所不同.
  • 用户不知不觉地为技术科学项目提供无偿劳动力,例如谷歌的reCAPTCHA.
  • 这突显了一些科学-公民结构的实践与民主理想之间的不一致.

结论:

  • 该研究揭示了某些公民科学实践中的剥削元素,这些实践逃避了批判性的社会学审查.
  • 认识到"黑暗公民科学"对于更细致地了解科学与公民之间的互动至关重要.
  • 未来的研究应该解决这些未被承认的贡献的伦理和社会影响.