临床惯性:一个更广泛的视角和建议的分类标准
1Department of General Medicine, Govt. Medical College, Manjeri, Kottayam, Kozhikode, Kerala, India.
Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolism
|October 23, 2023
概括
医疗保健中常见的问题临床惯性,通过早期识别的新标准重新定义. 这旨在帮助临床医生通过在急性和慢性疾病中识别和解决这种现象来更好地管理患者护理.
科学领域:
- 医学实践 医学实践
- 医疗保健管理的管理
- 临床决策 - 临床决策
背景情况:
- 临床惯性在日常医疗实践中很普遍,源于医生,患者或医疗保健系统因素.
- 它经常在慢性无症状疾病中观察到,但也发生在急性和症状性疾病中.
- 目前的术语和缺乏分类标准阻碍了早期识别.
研究的目的:
- 重新定义临床惯性,并为其早期识别建立明确的分类标准.
- 为临床医生和学者提供一个框架,以了解和解决临床惯性.
- 通过促进临床惯性识别和纠正,改善患者护理的管理.
主要方法:
- 在PubMed和Scopus数据库中的系统文献搜索.
- 包括原始文章和评论论文.
- 对现有文献进行分析和综合,以重新定义术语并提出新的标准.
主要成果:
- 重新定义临床惯性,以涵盖急性和慢性疾病.
- 关于针对临床惯性早期鉴定的具体分类标准的建议.
- 澄清术语,以减少医疗保健专业人员之间的混.
结论:
- 早期识别临床惯性对于有效的患者管理至关重要.
- 提出的标准和重新定义的术语将有助于临床医生识别和解决临床惯性问题.
- 本综述为临床实践和医疗保健学术研究提供了宝贵的资源.
更多相关视频
12:18A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
Published on: January 11, 2020
7.6K
08:36The Immersive Cleveland Clinic Virtual Reality Shopping Platform for the Assessment of Instrumental Activities of Daily Living
Published on: July 28, 2022
3.8K
相关概念视频
Classification of Illness
7.5K
The meaning of illness is individualized to each person who experiences an alteration in health. In contrast, disease is a medical term indicating a pathological change in the structure and function of the body or mind. It is a condition that has specific symptoms and boundaries.
An illness is a response to a disease in which the person's level of functioning is changed compared with a previous level. The general classification of illness includes acute and chronic.
Acute illness is severe...
An illness is a response to a disease in which the person's level of functioning is changed compared with a previous level. The general classification of illness includes acute and chronic.
Acute illness is severe...
7.5K
Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions
2.2K
Creating and executing a nursing diagnosis helps nurses plan care and guide patient, family, and community interventions. They are developed based on a patient's physical evaluation and support measuring the outcomes. It is not recommended to select random interventions throughout the planning process. Instead, consider the following six essential factors when choosing interventions:
2.2K
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
331
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
331
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I
303
The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:
303
Prevalence and Incidence
585
In statistical epidemiology and health sciences, two essential metrics—prevalence and incidence—are fundamental for understanding disease dynamics within a population. These measures enable public health officials, epidemiologists, and researchers to assess the burden of diseases, allocate resources effectively, and design impactful public health policies and interventions.
Prevalence indicates the proportion of individuals in a population who have a specific disease or health...
Prevalence indicates the proportion of individuals in a population who have a specific disease or health...
585
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
314
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
314
