参与党派的社交媒体话语是有毒的,即使政治无关紧要,政治也是无关紧要的
Michalis Mamakos1, Eli J Finkel1,2
1Department of Psychology, Northwestern University, 2029 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208, USA.
PNAS nexus
|October 23, 2023
概括
有毒个体更有可能参与党派在线讨论,他们的毒性扩展到无党派的背景. 这表明选择效应,而不仅仅是社交,驱动在线不文明.
科学领域:
- 社交媒体分析 社交媒体分析
- 计算社会科学 计算社会科学
- 政治沟通的政治沟通
背景情况:
- 社交媒体上的党派不文明往往归因于政治分歧或群体地位竞争.
- 现有的理论不能完全解释在政治话语中有毒在线行为的起源和传播.
研究的目的:
- 为了测试有毒个体不成比例地参与党派在线讨论的假设.
- 调查选择效应与社会化在不同环境中推动在线不文明的作用.
主要方法:
- 分析了超过9,000个Reddit子reddits的评论行为.
- 检查了来自630多万用户的数亿条评论.
- 在党派与非党派背景下以及跨用户参与模式的毒性水平的比较.
主要成果:
- 与非党派的相比,在党派的子编辑中,话语显著更有毒.
- 党派背景下的个人毒性与非党派背景中的毒性相关,表明了一般趋势,而不是特定于背景的行为.
- 参与党派和非党派讨论的用户表现出更高的毒性,而不是那些只参与一种类型的背景.
结论:
- 选择效应,即有毒个体被吸引到党派在线空间,似乎是不文明的主要驱动因素.
- 在党派回声室内的社会化并不能完全解释观察到的毒性模式.
- 跨语境参与,特别是跨左翼和右翼空间的双边参与,与无党派讨论中毒性增加有关.
相关概念视频
Group Polarization
34.3K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
34.3K
The Stanford Prison Experiment
23.2K
The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
23.2K
Groupthink
44.4K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
44.4K
In- and Out-Groups
39.1K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
39.1K
Social Traps
22.3K
Social traps are negative situations where people get caught in a direction or relationship that later proves to be unpleasant, with no easy way to back out of or avoid. The concept was orignally introduced by John Platt who applied psychology to Garrett Hardin's "Tragedy of the Commons", where in New England herd owners could let their cattle graze in the common ground. This situation seems like a good idea, but an individual could have an advantage. If they owned...
22.3K
Framing Effects
7.4K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
7.4K


