Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Self-Report Tests of Personality01:22

Self-Report Tests of Personality

360
Self-report inventories are objective personality assessments that use multiple-choice items or numbered scales, typically ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). They are often called Likert scales after Rensis Likert. These inventories are widely used due to their ease of administration and cost-effectiveness. One of the most prominent examples is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), initially developed in the 1940s to assess abnormal personality traits.
360

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Comparative effectiveness of ocrelizumab in subgroups of patients with multiple sclerosis: a multi-registry observational cohort study.

Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry·2026
Same author

Clusters of Comorbidities in Multiple Sclerosis and Their Influence on Healthcare Resource Usage.

European journal of neurology·2025
Same author

Haematopoietic stem cell transplant versus immune-reconstitution therapy in relapsing multiple sclerosis.

Brain : a journal of neurology·2025
Same author

Before the before: Is there a prodrome in patients with radiologically isolated syndrome?

Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England)·2025
Same author

No seasonality in the risk of multiple sclerosis in an equatorial country: A case-control ecological study.

Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England)·2022
Same author

The kappa free light chain index and oligoclonal bands have a similar role in the McDonald criteria.

Brain : a journal of neurology·2022

相关实验视频

Updated: Jul 12, 2025

The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test MSPT: An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool
11:35

The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test MSPT: An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool

Published on: June 30, 2014

58.0K

多发性硬化症功能测试及其与自我管理值的可比性:试点研究

Laura Estefanía Arenas-Vargas1, Lorena López-Reyes2, Simón Cárdenas-Robledo3

  • 1Centro de Esclerosis Múltiple, Hospital Universitario Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia; Departamento de Medicina Interna, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia. learenasv@unal.edu.co.

Biomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud
|October 23, 2023
PubMed
概括

在健康人群中,可以自行进行定时25英尺步行测试 (T25-FWT),符号数字模式测试 (SDMT) 和九孔测试 (9-HPT). 这种方法可以加强临床环境中的患者监测.

关键词:
多发性硬化症是多发性硬化症.远程监控 远程监控自己测试的自我测试.残疾评估残疾评价参考值是指指标值的参考值.

更多相关视频

Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills
10:32

Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills

Published on: April 23, 2014

18.5K
Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke
05:21

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke

Published on: January 7, 2019

5.8K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jul 12, 2025

The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test MSPT: An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool
11:35

The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test MSPT: An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool

Published on: June 30, 2014

58.0K
Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills
10:32

Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills

Published on: April 23, 2014

18.5K
Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke
05:21

Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke

Published on: January 7, 2019

5.8K

科学领域:

  • 神经学 神经学
  • 临床试验 临床试验
  • 康复医学 康复医学 康复医学

背景情况:

  • 在多发性硬化症 (MS) 中量化神经功能障碍是具有挑战性的,因为患者的变化和时间变化.
  • 已建立的结果指标,如T25-FWT,SDMT和9-HPT是敏感和可重复的,但由于时间和培训障碍,在日常护理中未得到充分利用.

研究的目的:

  • 评估T25-FWT,SDMT和9-HPT在健康成年人群中自我管理的可行性.
  • 为了确定这些测试的自我管理版本是否与医生指导的管理相关并同意.

主要方法:

  • 一项描述性试点研究,涉及18-80岁的健康成年人.
  • 在医生指导下给药,并指导自行给药T25-FWT,SDMT和9-HPT (主导和非主导手).
  • 使用皮尔森/斯皮尔曼相关性和布兰德-阿尔特曼方法进行统计分析,以比较指导测试与自我管理测试.

主要成果:

  • 38名健康的志愿者参加了这次活动.
  • 在指导和自我管理测试之间发现了显著的相关性:T25-FWT (r=0.37,p=0.01),SDMT (r=0.54,p<0.001) 和9-HPT (主导r=0.64,p<0.001;非主导r=0.65,p<0.001).
  • 布兰德-阿尔特曼分析表明,所有测量措施的引导测试和自我管理测试都一致.

结论:

  • 在健康个体中,T25-FWT,SDMT和9-HPT的自我管理是可行的.
  • 这些自我管理的测试提供了一个潜在的工具,以改善患者在常规临床实践中的监测.
  • 这种方法解决了在临床环境中使用已确定的结果措施的障碍.