Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

6.5K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.5K
Hindsight Biases01:12

Hindsight Biases

3.4K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now? 
3.4K
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

119
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
119
Revisionist Views of Adolescent and Adult Cognition01:24

Revisionist Views of Adolescent and Adult Cognition

38
A revisionist approach to Jean Piaget's theory of cognitive development has brought new insights that challenge and reinterpret his established ideas. Piaget proposed that the formal operational stage, emerging in adolescence, represents the culmination of cognitive maturity. During this stage, individuals are said to develop abstract thinking, engage in systematic problem-solving, and show a form of egocentrism, believing others are as preoccupied with their behavior as they are...
38
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

59.5K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
59.5K
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

5.5K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
5.5K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

A diffusion-based framework for modeling systematic, time-varying cognitive processes.

Psychological review·2026
Same author

High-value decisions are made quickly, with no consistent effect on accuracy.

PNAS nexus·2025
Same author

Parameter estimation of hyper-spherical diffusion models with a time-dependent threshold: An integral equation method.

Behavior research methods·2025
Same author

Attention to direct gaze in young and older adulthood.

Consciousness and cognition·2025
Same author

People are at least as good at optimizing reward rate under equivalent fixed-trial compared to fixed-time conditions.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2025
Same author

The value of error-correcting responses for cognitive assessment in games.

Scientific reports·2024

相关实验视频

Updated: Jul 12, 2025

Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats
08:06

Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats

Published on: June 18, 2018

7.3K

允许改变心态是否会影响最初的反应?

Grant J Taylor1, Augustine T Nguyen1,2, Nathan J Evans3,4

  • 1School of Psychology, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia.

Psychonomic bulletin & review
|October 26, 2023
PubMed
概括

明确的双重响应范式,允许参与者改变主意,不会改变快速决策任务中的初始决策. 这证实了它们在未来研究证据积累模型中的使用.

关键词:
改变了自己的想法.双重响应的双重响应证据积累模型的模型.响应时间模型.

更多相关视频

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

5.8K
New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat
09:45

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat

Published on: January 23, 2017

8.2K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jul 12, 2025

Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats
08:06

Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats

Published on: June 18, 2018

7.3K
The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

5.8K
New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat
09:45

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat

Published on: January 23, 2017

8.2K

科学领域:

  • 认知心理学 认知心理学
  • 计算神经科学是一种计算神经科学.
  • 决策科学科学 决策科学

背景情况:

  • 证据积累模型 (EAM) 是理解快速决策的关键.
  • 模型模拟在预测中挑战了不同EAM变体之间的比较.
  • 双重反应提供了一种减少模仿模型的方法.

研究的目的:

  • 为决策研究验证明确的双重响应范式.
  • 评估是否允许响应变化影响初始决策参数.
  • 为了确定明确的双重响应是否对标准范式进行概括.

主要方法:

  • 使用明确的双重响应范式进行了三项实验.
  • 扩散模型参数用于测量初始决策策略.
  • 用贝叶斯分析来评估支持或反对零假设的证据.

主要成果:

  • 允许参与者改变他们的反应并没有显著改变实验中的初始决策参数.
  • 贝叶斯分析在所有情况下都提供了支持零假设 (没有差异) 的适度证据.
  • 最初的应对策略保持一致,而不管有明确的改变许可.

结论:

  • 显式的双响应范式被验证用于决策研究.
  • 这些范式不会干扰初始响应选择的自然过程.
  • 研究结果支持明确的双重响应对标准决策任务的概括性.