市场思维可以通过比例思维在信任游戏中增加分配
Anna O Kuzminska1, Agata Gasiorowska2, Anna M Hełka2
1Faculty of Management, University of Warsaw.
Journal of experimental psychology. Applied
|November 2, 2023
概括
市场思维方式可以增加人际信任,当个人通过市场定价镜头来看待情况时. 这项研究探讨了比例思维如何影响人们对经济游戏的信任.
科学领域:
- 社会心理学 社会心理学
- 行为经济学是一种行为经济学.
- 决策 - 决策 - 决策 - 决策
背景情况:
- 之前的研究表明,市场思维方式会对人际信任产生负面影响.
- 这项研究挑战了这一发现的普遍性,提出了可以增强信任的条件.
研究的目的:
- 调查市场思维是否可以在特定条件下增加人际信任.
- 检查市场定价观念和比例思维在信任动态中的作用.
主要方法:
- 一项试点研究确定了信任游戏的看法是市场定价而不是社区共享.
- 三个实验测试了市场思维对信任游戏分配的影响.
- 调解分析探讨了比例思维和对比例敏感性的作用.
主要成果:
- 与对照组相比,具有市场思维的参与者在信任游戏中进行了更大的分配.
- 这种效应是由参与比例思维的动机介导的.
- 具有市场意识的个人对比例表现出更大的敏感性,根据乘数调整分配.
结论:
- 市场思维并不普遍阻碍信任;当市场定价原则突出时,它可以促进信任.
- 比例思维和对经济比率的敏感性是推动市场导向环境中的信任的关键机制.
- 这些发现提升了我们对经济思维方式与人际信任之间的相互作用的理解.
更多相关视频
11:51Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making
Published on: March 2, 2011
15.1K
08:24The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
740
相关概念视频
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
7.3K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.3K
Groupthink
44.4K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
44.4K
Decision Making: Traditional Method
4.0K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
4.0K
Framing Effects
7.4K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
7.4K
The Availability Heuristic
6.0K
A heuristic is a general problem-solving framework (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). You can think of these as mental shortcuts that are used to solve problems. Different types of heuristics are used in different types of situations, and the impulse to use a heuristic occurs when one of five conditions is met (Pratkanis, 1989):
6.0K
Social Loafing
34.8K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
34.8K
