Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Orthogeriatric Fracture Syndrome: A Large-Scale Bibliometric Analysis of a Proposed Concept for Cross-Disciplinary Awareness and Coordinated Care.

Journal of clinical medicine·2026
Same author

Feasibility of a Multi-Perspective Diagnostic Teaching Feedback Tool in Undergraduate Physiotherapy Education.

Journal of medical education and curricular development·2026
Same author

A Discourse Analytical Approach Focusing on Quality in Higher Education.

Journal of medical education and curricular development·2026
Same author

Psychometric validation of the German Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS) in an undergraduate health professions students cohort in Switzerland: a cross-sectional study.

BMC psychology·2026
Same author

Time as a Teacher: Using Historical Analysis to Shape Professional Identity in Health Professions Education.

Journal of medical education and curricular development·2026
Same author

Physical therapists' perspectives and practices on weight management for chronic pain patients with obesity: a cross-sectional survey.

Archives of physiotherapy·2025

相关实验视频

Updated: Jul 11, 2025

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
13:44

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques

Published on: December 9, 2022

3.6K

临床前物理治疗学生的自学指导 - - 一项可行性研究.

Elisabeth Schenk1, Jan Taeymans1,2, Slavko Rogan1

  • 1School of Health Professions, Division of Physiotherapy, Bern University of Applied Sciences, Bern, Switzerland.

The South African journal of physiotherapy
|November 6, 2023
PubMed
概括

与传统方法相比,指导自学 (G-SS) 改善了物理治疗学生的知识和实践技能. 虽然学生参与率很低,但G-SS计划显示出有前途的可能性,可能会对可行性进行修改.

关键词:
高等教育 高等教育学习是为了获得收益.自主导向的学习学习自己学习的自学.以教师为中心的教学指导.

更多相关视频

Author Spotlight: Evaluating Clinicians' Adoption of Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Cannulation Through Simulation Training
05:04

Author Spotlight: Evaluating Clinicians' Adoption of Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Cannulation Through Simulation Training

Published on: August 9, 2024

958
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.0K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jul 11, 2025

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
13:44

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques

Published on: December 9, 2022

3.6K
Author Spotlight: Evaluating Clinicians' Adoption of Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Cannulation Through Simulation Training
05:04

Author Spotlight: Evaluating Clinicians' Adoption of Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Cannulation Through Simulation Training

Published on: August 9, 2024

958
Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities
10:26

Problem-Solving Before Instruction PS-I: A Protocol for Assessment and Intervention in Students with Different Abilities

Published on: September 11, 2021

4.0K

科学领域:

  • 医学教育 医学教育
  • 物理治疗培训 物理治疗培训
  • 课程开发 课程开发

背景情况:

  • 关于指导自学 (G-SS) 对本科生知识和技能的影响的文献有限.
  • 在物理治疗教育中G-SS的有效性需要进一步调查.

研究的目的:

  • 评估G-SS课程在本科物理治疗课程中的可行性和有效性.
  • 评估G-SS对知识获取和实践技能发展的影响.

主要方法:

  • 53名理疗学生被随机分配到G-SS和对照组 (CG).
  • G-SS组在8天周期中准备了临床病例;CG使用了原始课程单元.
  • 结果包括任务时间,学生反应能力,课程差异化,知识 (MCQ) 和技能 (OSCE).

主要成果:

  • 学生对G-SS计划的反应率为32%,低于83%的目标.
  • 两组之间没有观察到程序区分的显著差异.
  • G-SS组获得的OSCE分数 (p=0.003) 比CG高得多,表明技能发展优越.

结论:

  • 在目前的格式下,G-SS计划面临着可行性挑战,原因是学生的响应能力较低.
  • 建议进行修改,例如改进时间规划和减少工作量,以提高学生参与度.
  • 尽管存在可行性问题,G-SS在知识和技能改进方面表现出优于对照组的优势.