在本科生中开发和验证团队互动培训问卷 (PBTITQ) 的感知益处
Ming Chen1, Hefang Chen2, Yifan Wu3
1Teaching and Research Department of P.E, China Medical University, No.77 Puhe Road, Shenyang North New Area, Shenyang, 110122, China.
BMC medical education
|November 8, 2023
概括
这项研究开发了团队互动培训问卷 (PBTITQ) 的感知好处,以评估本科生团队互动培训. PBTITQ是评估感知效益的有效和可靠工具,有助于课程开发.
科学领域:
- 教育心理学教育心理学
- 社会心理学 社会心理学
- 项目评价 项目评价
背景情况:
- 团队互动培训的有效性已经确立,但缺乏客观评估工具.
- 本科生对团队互动益处的看法需要进一步调查.
- 开发有效的评估工具对于优化大学培训计划至关重要.
研究的目的:
- 开发和验证测量本科生从团队互动培训中感知到的好处的工具.
- 为团队互动课程的有效性提供见解.
- 为提高大学一级团队互动培训提供参考.
主要方法:
- 一个三阶段的方法:项目生成 (52个项目),初步问卷开发 (25个项目通过EFA),以及心理测量属性测试 (CFA,可靠性,有效性).
- 基于社会认知理论,自我效能理论和体育表现模型的理论框架.
- 使用了Delphi咨询,试点测试,项目分析,EFA和CFA用于工具验证.
主要成果:
- 最后的23项团队互动培训问卷 (PBTITQ) 的感知好处显示出一个强大的三因素结构 (凝聚力,沟通,效率).
- 证实了高的内部一致性 (克朗巴赫α=0.90) 和测试复试可靠性 (0.88).
- 与GEQ (r=0.808) 和TDM (r=0.796) 的显著相关性支持了与标准相关的有效性.
结论:
- PBTITQ是一个在心理测量上健全和有效的工具,用于评估本科生对团队互动培训的感知益处.
- 经过验证的问卷可以用于评估现有课程,并为未来培训计划的设计提供信息.
- 该工具有助于在团队互动培训评估领域进行客观测量.
相关概念视频
Cognitive Dissonance
32.6K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
32.6K
Social Facilitation
32.0K
Not all intergroup interactions lead to negative outcomes. Sometimes, being in a group situation can improve performance. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled.
32.0K
Social Proof
27.7K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.7K
Robbers Cave
14.3K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.3K


