高级和低级领导人之间首选可信度的差异
Shimei Yan1, Lizhe Chen2, Gang Zhang1
1School of Management, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Psychological reports
|November 9, 2023
概括
领导者的可信度因素因层次而异. 在低级领导人中,下属优先考虑情绪稳定和可接受性,但在高级领导人中优先考虑能力. 诚信是信任上升的关键.
科学领域:
- 组织行为 组织行为
- 领导力研究 领导力研究
- 心理学 心理学 心理学
背景情况:
- 隐性领导力理论 (ILT) 表明,领导者的认知是由潜意识的期望塑造的.
- 对领导力的信任是有效的团队动态和组织成功的关键组成部分.
- 了解信任因素在不同领导层之间如何变化对于领导力发展至关重要.
研究的目的:
- 调查下属对领导者可信度的看法是否根据领导者的等级层面而有所不同.
- 确定在不同领导层显著的特定可信度因素 (例如,诚信,能力,可取性).
- 检查领导者诚信在向上信任中的作用.
主要方法:
- 一种多方法方法,结合了场景模拟 (220名参与者),实验设计 (562名参与者) 和经验调查 (193个样本).
- 数据收集的重点是各个层次层次的领导者对领导者可信度的下属感知.
- 使用统计分析来确定显著的差异和关系.
主要成果:
- 在低级领导人中,下属重视情感稳定,外向,愉悦和仁慈.
- 与能力相关的可信度对高级领导者来说更为关键.
- 领导者的诚信成为上升信任的最重要因素,无论领导层级别如何.
结论:
- 领导者的可信度不是单一的;它的关键组成部分取决于层次层级.
- 人力资源管理策略应根据层次上下文量身定制领导层的选择和发展.
- 这些发现促进了对ILT的理解和对领导文献的信任.
关键词:
上升的信任可以信任.层次层次的层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次层次领导 领导 领导 领导 领导 领导 领导可信度 值得信赖 值得信赖更多相关视频
08:24The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
740
06:42Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
Published on: September 28, 2018
11.6K
相关概念视频
02:45Self-Discrepancy Theory
18.3K
One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.
18.3K
00:52Social Proof
27.7K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.7K
01:14Fundamental Attribution Error
12.9K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
12.9K
02:16Stereotype Content Model
14.7K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.7K
03:00Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
5.2K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
5.2K
01:37Social Loafing
34.8K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
34.8K