减少全球不平等增加了地方合作:一个简单的群体选择模型,具有全球外部效应
Karolina Safarzynska1, Paul E Smaldino2,3
1Faculty of Economic Sciences, Warsaw University, Długa 44/50, 00-241 Warsaw, Poland.
概括
全球外部因素可以促进合作,但只有当它们有利于穷人或不利于富人时. 对穷人的伤害破坏了亲社会行为的进化,这对于气候变化适应至关重要.
科学领域:
- 进化生物学是进化的生物学.
- 环境科学环境科学
- 行为经济学是一种行为经济学.
背景情况:
- 群体结构模型通过个人和群体选择来解释亲社会行为.
- 现有的模型往往忽略了超越群体界限的后果,例如影响全球环境变量行为的行为.
- 气候变化和生态系统脆弱性是受集体行动影响的全球环境问题的例子.
研究的目的:
- 提出和分析一个包含全球外部性的多层次选择模型.
- 调查合作行动的全球后果如何影响亲社会行为的演变.
- 检查具有均或不均分布的全球外部性影响的场景,特别是对不同社会经济群体的影响.
主要方法:
- 开发一个简单的多层次选择模型.
- 使用模拟来探索全球外部性分布的各种场景.
- 分析当外部因素对富人或穷人产生不成比例的影响时,合作是如何受到影响的.
主要成果:
- 全球外部性只有当它们不成比例地使穷人受益或减少富人的回报时,才能促进合作.
- 如果说全球外部因素主要伤害穷人,那么它们也会破坏社会行为进化的发展.
- 全球外部性影响的分布显著调节了合作的演变.
结论:
- 全球外部效应对合作的影响取决于这些外部效应如何在社会经济群体之间分布.
- 了解全球环境变化对弱势群体的不同影响,对于促进可持续的社会行为至关重要.
- 这项研究强调了社会困境,群体动态和全球环境挑战的相互联系.
相关概念视频
In- and Out-Groups
39.1K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
39.1K
Inclusive Fitness
36.0K
Most altruistic behavior—in which one animal helps another at a cost to themselves—occurs between relatives. Scientists think these altruistic behaviors evolved because they increase the inclusive fitness of the animal providing help.
36.0K
Robbers Cave
14.3K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.3K
Social Loafing
34.8K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
34.8K
Group Polarization
34.3K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
34.3K
Groupthink
44.4K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
44.4K


