考虑到已经看过的奇怪,罕见和突然的情况
Nikola Andonovski1, Kourken Michaelian1
1Centre de philosophie de la mémoire, Institut de philosophie de Grenoble, Université Grenoble Alpes, CS 40700, Grenoble, Cedex 9, France nikola.andonovski@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr kourken.michaelian@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr http://phil-mem.org/members/andonovski.php http://phil-mem.org/members/michaelian.php.
The Behavioral and brain sciences
|November 14, 2023
概括
虽然déjà vu体验与记忆检索有关,但它具有独特的特征,如奇怪和突然发作. 需要进一步的研究才能将这些现象完全整合到自传记忆研究中.
科学领域:
- 认知心理学 认知心理学
- 神经科学是一个神经科学.
- 记忆研究 记忆研究
背景情况:
- 自传记忆检索是认知心理学的一个关键领域.
- 已经见过的理论经常将它与记忆过程联系起来,但缺乏全面的解释.
- 现有的模型很难解释已见的主观品质.
研究的目的:
- 评估Barzykowski和Moulin的建议,将已见与自传记忆检索联系起来.
- 找出当前关于"已见"的主观性质理论中的局限性.
- 在记忆研究中倡导一种更完整的方法来研究已见.
主要方法:
- 现有已见和自传记忆检索模型的理论分析.
- 基于对已见的经验观察,批评Barzykowski和Moulin的建议.
- 确定已见体验的关键现象学特征.
主要成果:
- 巴齐科夫斯基和穆林的提议不能充分解释已经看过的奇怪之处.
- 该提案未能考虑到已经见过的特征的罕见性和突然发作.
- 在将主观的已见经历与自传记忆理论相结合时,存在显著的差距.
结论:
- 目前的理论,包括Barzykowski和Moulin的提议,不足以解释全方位的déjà vu现象.
- 已经见过的独特特性需要进一步的研究才能完全理解.
- 整合已见的主观和客观方面对于推进记忆研究至关重要.
相关概念视频
Cause and Effect
10.9K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
10.9K
Deindividuation
26.4K
Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.
26.4K
Hindsight Biases
3.4K
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?
3.4K
Correlation and Causation
37.7K
Statistical tests can calculate whether there is a relationship, or correlation, between independent and dependent variables. An indirect relationship of the variables signifies a correlation, while a direct relationship shows causation. If it is determined that no connection exists between the variables, then the correlation is a coincidence.
Correlation versus Causation
If the dependent variable increases or decreases when the independent variable increases, there is a positive or negative...
Correlation versus Causation
If the dependent variable increases or decreases when the independent variable increases, there is a positive or negative...
37.7K
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
330
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
330
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I
300
The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:
300


