不是所有的选票都应该被视为平等:以教育为基础的非人性化如何破坏民主社会契约
Mario Sainz1, Alexandra Vázquez1
1Departamento de Psicología Social y de las Organizaciones, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), Madrid, Spain.
The British journal of social psychology
|November 16, 2023
概括
教育水平较低导致非人性化和对民主权利的质疑. 这项研究强调了教育的值如何破坏政治平等和民主制度.
科学领域:
- 社会心理学 社会心理学
- 政治科学 政治科学是指政治学.
- 社会学 社会学 社会学
背景情况:
- 社会对受教育程度较低的人及其意见的值.
- 受教育程度较低的群体在政治中的代表性不足,挑战民主合法性.
- 有限研究以教育为基础的非人道化及其对民主权利的影响.
研究的目的:
- 调查对受教育程度较低的个人和群体的非人道化.
- 检查对受教育程度较低的人群质疑民主权利的情况.
- 建立基于教育的非人性化和拒绝民主权利之间的联系.
主要方法:
- 来自多项研究的相关证据 (N=304,N=504,N=447) 检查了非人道化和民主权利.
- 一项实验性研究 (N=470) 证实了教育,非人化和权利剥夺之间的因果关系.
- 分析教育背景如何影响人类和民主权利的归属.
主要成果:
- 受教育程度较低的个人和群体被剥夺了人性,他们的民主权利 (投票,竞选) 被质疑.
- 缺乏人性化的趋势预测支持拒绝投票权或公共候选人的教育程度较低的个人.
- 教育背景影响人类对人类的看法,这反过来影响拒绝民主权利.
结论:
- 基于教育的非人性化对受教育程度较低的个人和群体的民主权利构成威胁.
- 教育的值可以通过边缘化特定人群来破坏民主制度的基础.
- 解决基于教育的偏见对于维护民主原则和确保政治平等至关重要.
更多相关视频
06:42Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
Published on: September 28, 2018
11.6K
06:58Highlighting and Reducing the Impact of Negative Aging Stereotypes During Older Adults' Cognitive Testing
Published on: January 24, 2020
7.4K
相关概念视频
Deindividuation
26.4K
Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.
26.4K
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
90.2K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
90.2K
Group Polarization
34.3K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
34.3K
The Stanford Prison Experiment
23.2K
The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
23.2K
Fundamental Attribution Error
12.9K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
12.9K
Stereotype Content Model
14.7K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.7K
