Jove
Visualize
联系我们
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
关于 JoVE
概览领导团队博客JoVE 帮助中心
作者
出版流程编辑委员会范围与政策同行评审常见问题投稿
图书馆员
用户评价订阅访问资源图书馆顾问委员会常见问题
研究
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments存档
教育
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab Manual教师资源中心教师网站
使用条款与条件
隐私政策
政策

相关概念视频

Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

23.0K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
23.0K
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

59.5K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
59.5K

您也可能阅读

相关文章

通过共同作者、期刊和引用图与本文相关的文章。

排序
Same author

Multi-method validation of the new computerized test of fluid intelligence MatriKS.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same author

Error patterns on a computerized version of Raven's progressive matrices in specific learning disorders.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same author

Prolonged Visual Entrainment Induces Long-Lasting Alpha-Band Modulations.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same author

Sensor-Based Assessment of Morning Prospective Memory in Narcolepsy Type 1: Evidence from Children and Adult Cohorts.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Psychometric properties of the Usability and Acceptability Scale (UAS) for evaluating digital tools in children and adolescent users.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same author

Test-retest reliability of the gaze index for sign-tracking and goal-tracking.

Behavior research methods·2026

相关实验视频

Updated: Jul 10, 2025

Measuring Engagement of Spectators of Social Digital Games
14:02

Measuring Engagement of Spectators of Social Digital Games

Published on: July 3, 2021

3.5K

游戏化中的学习景观:在研究应用中需要一个方法论协议的需求

Matteo Orsoni1, Adam Dubé2, Catia Prandi3

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Bologna.

Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science
|November 20, 2023
PubMed
概括

本研究涉及教育游戏化研究中的方法论问题. 它提出了一份检查清单,以提高游戏化学习研究的严格性,提高动机和参与度.

关键词:
申请申请表 申请表 申请表检查清单 检查清单 检查清单孩子孩子孩子孩子孩子孩子发展发展发展发展发展.教育教育教育教育的教育.在学习中进行游戏化.目标 目标 目标 目标 目标.方法论上的严谨性.方法论 方法论 方法论动机 激励 动机奖励 奖励 奖励 奖励 奖励科学的科学科学的科学科学

更多相关视频

Combining Computer Game-Based Behavioural Experiments With High-Density EEG and Infrared Gaze Tracking
13:40

Combining Computer Game-Based Behavioural Experiments With High-Density EEG and Infrared Gaze Tracking

Published on: December 16, 2010

16.7K
The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.1K

相关实验视频

Last Updated: Jul 10, 2025

Measuring Engagement of Spectators of Social Digital Games
14:02

Measuring Engagement of Spectators of Social Digital Games

Published on: July 3, 2021

3.5K
Combining Computer Game-Based Behavioural Experiments With High-Density EEG and Infrared Gaze Tracking
13:40

Combining Computer Game-Based Behavioural Experiments With High-Density EEG and Infrared Gaze Tracking

Published on: December 16, 2010

16.7K
The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.1K

科学领域:

  • 教育技术的教育技术
  • 学习科学 学习科学
  • 人与计算机的交互

背景情况:

  • 游戏化,即将游戏设计元素整合到教育中,旨在提高学习者的动力和参与度.
  • 现有的关于游戏化对教育影响的研究存在方法上的局限性,从而降低了结果的可靠性.
  • 需要更严格的研究设计来准确评估游戏化学习的有效性.

研究的目的:

  • 确定游戏化学习研究中方法论挑战的关键概念.
  • 利用现有的文献争议来改善研究设计.
  • 开发一个检查列表协议,以提高游戏化学习研究的严格性.

主要方法:

  • 文献审查和对教育中的游戏化现有研究的分析.
  • 识别和综合当前研究中的方法论缺陷和争议.
  • 根据已识别的主持人和最佳实践制定一个检查清单.

主要成果:

  • 确定了游戏化研究中的关键方法问题.
  • 制定了一个检查列表协议,以指导更严格的研究的设计.
  • 突出了影响游戏化-学习联系的潜在主持人.

结论:

  • 提高研究设计的严谨性对于教育中的可靠游戏化研究至关重要.
  • 拟议的检查清单可以促进创建更强大的关于游戏化学习的研究.
  • 进一步的研究应侧重于解决发现的方法差距,以更好地了解游戏化的影响.